Kahuna Burger said:
if you are playing as a team effort, "the groups hard earned loot" does indeed belong to "the group" and you divide as best for the future of the group with additional concern for character concepts and in a split decision who "deserves it more".
Numion said:
Ok, if you put it that way it seems like a good ideaI was just here thinking if the forsaker even joined the group, since they rescued him and he wasn't seen again..
Aloïsius said:I would never allow a forsaker when I'm a DM, nor play one or let one live if one try to join the party when I'm a PC.
LostSoul said:The DM sounds like a two year old.
Kahuna Burger said:
Even as a short term character? that sounds like a very limiting way to play. The class can certainly be played in a more personal way (I will not use magic or allow it to be used on me, and will try to lead others by example, but acknowlege that many people still have the crutch of magic...) than the 'kill all magic users' type, and they are under no obligation to destroy every magic item they can lay hands on regardless of ownership...
I don't know how it would work out long term, but at the level he was playing, a forsaker could be a viable expereince...
kahuna burger