Flexor the Mighty!
18/100 Strength!
I liked it, though I was never a big fan of the primes and saving throws, though 5e adapted pretty much the same system and it worked OK. Ease of adaption from older editions was a huge plus for me.
Yeah, my problems with BoF aside -- and I have several non-wizard characters in my campaign who use the options in the book -- C&C is a really great option to merge 1E sensibilities with 3E math and design.This, definitely! I would have been happier had that book just been a set of ideas for familiars, instead of buying a book I thought had been vetted and was ready for use. BoF cannot be used as written.
That said, I've had very few issues with their other products and just LOVE the ease of play that is C&C. Compared to most OSRs I would put them at 'high powered' for your level of experience. Running a group of level one C&C characters through any of the old first level AD&D modules shouldn't challenge them too much, nor stress the DM in converting the material on the fly. It has been my go-to system for years and will continue to be so, despite some meddling with AS&SH of late...
I would love a detailed head to head comparison of the two systems. Since I already have C&C, I was never tempted to pick up 5E early on. (If I was going to use a different system, it would be Dungeon Crawl Classics, since it captures the vibe of the games I played early on so well.) But 5E seems to be the real deal and I like what I've heard about it.I liked it, though I was never a big fan of the primes and saving throws, though 5e adapted pretty much the same system and it worked OK. Ease of adaption from older editions was a huge plus for me.
Too bad, it looks like I missed a "50% off" sale by only a couple of hours.![]()
I would love a detailed head to head comparison of the two systems. Since I already have C&C, I was never tempted to pick up 5E early on. (If I was going to use a different system, it would be Dungeon Crawl Classics, since it captures the vibe of the games I played early on so well.) But 5E seems to be the real deal and I like what I've heard about it.
I have the 7th printing, and there is a (very minor) typo on the contents page that has been there since the first printing.I just wish they would reprint the PH with all the errata in it, I think they are on the 7th printing and they still use the text from the original I've been told. I've only got books from the first two runs so I haven't verified this.
Obviously, in my own game I'd be free to not have half orcs be treated as pariahs (or just remove them altogether as a PC race), and I'd allow all rangers to be able to swim. However, it would be nice if I didn't have to.