Mercurius
Legend
If you're into X, then play Dragonbane.
If you're into Y, then play Shadowdark.
If you're into Z, then play Pathfinder.
And so on.
"X, Y, Z" can be any specific or gestalt of qualities you feel like assembling, and of course include as many games as you like. I'd even suggest being vague as to what "D&Dish" means...I mean, if you need me to define it, I'd suggest something simple like "adventure-based fantasy."
I'm mainly just curious how people would characterize the plentiful "D&D alternatives" that are out there now, many of which have stable fan bases - and specifically, how they might be characterized in reference to D&D.
And of course the reasons a person is "done with D&D" might vary - be it WotC corporatism, their recent artistic direction, tonal qualities, complexity fatigue, or just wanting a change, etc -- I don't think that part really matters, except as it relates to the alternatives and what they offer.
Have at it....
If you're into Y, then play Shadowdark.
If you're into Z, then play Pathfinder.
And so on.
"X, Y, Z" can be any specific or gestalt of qualities you feel like assembling, and of course include as many games as you like. I'd even suggest being vague as to what "D&Dish" means...I mean, if you need me to define it, I'd suggest something simple like "adventure-based fantasy."
I'm mainly just curious how people would characterize the plentiful "D&D alternatives" that are out there now, many of which have stable fan bases - and specifically, how they might be characterized in reference to D&D.
And of course the reasons a person is "done with D&D" might vary - be it WotC corporatism, their recent artistic direction, tonal qualities, complexity fatigue, or just wanting a change, etc -- I don't think that part really matters, except as it relates to the alternatives and what they offer.
Have at it....