Kae'Yoss
First Post
tenkar said:My guess... $2.50 a session would be the low end... $5 a session would be the high end... that's per player.
Cut those in half and you have my guesses.
Remember that they only get a small portion of what the subscriber gets.
I'd like to see an option for just the gaming table... $5 a month, or even $6.99 a month.
I'd guess that if you do nothing but participate in, say, 4 games per month, it will cost you about that much. And that's already much if you think that for about twice that amount, you get unlimited access, the ability to host sessions, the magazines and all those other tools.
tenkar said:If WotC expects to get MMORPG fees from the average player that might want to game at a Virtual table they need to realize there are cheaper alternatives that they are in completion with. Cheaper because they are either free or one time purchases.
Right now, it's all speculation. We don't know yet how much a one-time admission fee for a virtual game will be. Could be as low as a dollar.
The thing is: If you want to host a game as DM, you must be a subscriber. So they have the DM's money in their pocket already.
If they can get, something like 5 bucks out of players who will only be using the virtual table as players, that might be enough for them. That will get some players who want nothing but play.
I'm not sure whether those are that many: A lot of people might want to use the other tools, like full text information in the character builder, and many groups have several DMs who take turns running campaigns (in our group, all but two players have run games in the past, and right now, we have two campaigns running side by side once a fortnight each), so those will probably want to run their own virtual games, and thus subscribe.
DM's are used to footing the gaming bill... most players are not. If the cost for the players is significant many (most?) will not pony up.
Bunch of cheap bastards!