Sorcerers have never seen much play in any games I've run or played. After a bloodbath in my current campaign, a player has decided to try the class.
Something caught his eye and we're trying to see if there is a game effect that my group has missed, if it's an artefact of a early design that got cut, or just odd wording.
The Sorcerer class is the only class with the available spell lists description to contain a qualifier:
Constrast this with the Bard and the Wizard:
So why the qualification `primarily`? All the other spellcasting classes are quite explicit.
If it matters, we`re playing core 3.5 D&D, but I`m willing to look at later material if there is a clarification. I`ve tried both the 3.0 FAQ and 3.5 main FAQ without success.
Something caught his eye and we're trying to see if there is a game effect that my group has missed, if it's an artefact of a early design that got cut, or just odd wording.
The Sorcerer class is the only class with the available spell lists description to contain a qualifier:
SRD said:A sorcerer casts arcane spells which are drawn primarily from the sorcerer/wizard spell list.
Constrast this with the Bard and the Wizard:
SRD said:A bard casts arcane spells, which are drawn from the bard spell list.
A wizard casts arcane spells which are drawn from the sorcerer/ wizard spell list.
So why the qualification `primarily`? All the other spellcasting classes are quite explicit.
If it matters, we`re playing core 3.5 D&D, but I`m willing to look at later material if there is a clarification. I`ve tried both the 3.0 FAQ and 3.5 main FAQ without success.