Atom Again
First Post
After reading the thread on "Am I the only 3.0 grognard left?" it got me thinking about one of my pet peeves lately.
Why do gaming companies feel the need to manipulate us by using computer and biology metaphors to describe their new editions?
Don't know what I mean? Simple...
Dungeons & Dragons isn't getting a new edition. It's "evolving".
World of Darkness isn't getting a new edition. It's "rebooting".
People who switch to these new editions aren't merely switching. They are "upgrading."
Notice how these metaphors all suggest that the new editions are somehow "superior" to the old? More "highly evolved"? More "powerful"? More "functional"?
And many gamers buy into this crap. They shake their heads at fellow gamers who refuse to "upgrade", to "evolve", to "modernize."
Newsflash: organisms evolve. Games DON'T. Computers get upgrades. Games DON'T.
[RANT OFF]
Why do gaming companies feel the need to manipulate us by using computer and biology metaphors to describe their new editions?
Don't know what I mean? Simple...
Dungeons & Dragons isn't getting a new edition. It's "evolving".
World of Darkness isn't getting a new edition. It's "rebooting".
People who switch to these new editions aren't merely switching. They are "upgrading."
Notice how these metaphors all suggest that the new editions are somehow "superior" to the old? More "highly evolved"? More "powerful"? More "functional"?
And many gamers buy into this crap. They shake their heads at fellow gamers who refuse to "upgrade", to "evolve", to "modernize."
Newsflash: organisms evolve. Games DON'T. Computers get upgrades. Games DON'T.
[RANT OFF]