Yes, very clear. Clear that if you cast a bonus action spell you can't cast another spell.The text says you can't cast another spell (it doesn't mention casting time - action, bonus action, or reaction) on your turn, except a cantrip. Very clear![]()
Yes, very clear. Clear that if you cast a bonus action spell you can't cast another spell.The text says you can't cast another spell (it doesn't mention casting time - action, bonus action, or reaction) on your turn, except a cantrip. Very clear![]()
Yes, very clear. Clear that if you cast a bonus action spell you can't cast another spell.
The text says you can't cast another spell (it doesn't mention casting time - action, bonus action, or reaction) on your turn, except a cantrip. Very clear![]()
A spell cast with a bonus action is especially swift. You must use a bonus action on Your Turn to cast the spell, provided that you haven’t already taken a bonus action this turn. You can’t cast another spell during the same turn, except for a cantrip with a casting time of 1 action.
Yes it does.
If you cast a bonus action spell, you can only cast a 1 action cantrip on the same turn. I don't understand the confusion.
You don't have to "assume" a bonus action spell. It says bonus action in the two sentences immediately preceding. The rule is not remotely ambiguous; weird and sorta silly, but not ambiguous.It is clear if you assume a bonus action spell, and I understand why you would. But it is still an assumption, so it could be more clear.
How the hell can I get myself out of this thread without appearing rude?! Any suggestions?
That feels rude to me.Stop replying.
I already did, but no one seems to notice or acknowledge thatConcede the argument.
I don't want to do that.Keep arguing till everyone else stops replying.
It isn't. People ghost forum threads all the time. This is (edit: corrected) asynchronous communication; people are not hanging on this thread waiting for your reply. They see the reply notification and come to answer. If that notification never comes, they carry on with their lives.That feels rude to me.
It's not conceding to say (paraphrasing) "We can agree to disagree." That is attempting to defuse the argument without conceding. Conceding would be if you said, "Okay, you're right, the limitation only applies to bonus action spells unless you house-rule otherwise."I already did, but no one seems to notice or acknowledge that
Or you could just abstain from casting a bonus action spell if you want to retain the ability to counterspell a possible counterspell...Personally, I read counterspell as one spell that is a reaction for a specific situation as being more specific than the more general rule of the bonus action only allowing a cantrip to go along with it. Because of that, I allow the counterspell to be used regardless of the spell originally cast.
It isn't Counterspell that is the bonus action spell. The rule says that if you cast a bonus action spell (say a Quickened Fireball) you can't cast a non-cantrip spell on your turn.I don't see how the RAW is unclear. There is a rule that limits you to cantrips when you cast a bonus action spell. Counterspell isn't a bonus action spell. Therefore, that rule doesn't apply. Very clear.
It isn't Counterspell that is the bonus action spell. The rule says that if you cast a bonus action spell (say a Quickened Fireball) you can't cast a non-cantrip spell on your turn.
Counterspell is not a cantrip, is the relevant argument for "I don't see how the RAW is unclear". Since it isn't a cantrip you can't cast it (even though it is a reaction) on your own turn (to counterspell a counterspell).