Spycraft and how it goes up against D20 modern

Wolfspider said:
Dance, little men, dance!!!

Buricid.gif
Buricid.gif
Buricid.gif
Buricid.gif
Buricid.gif
Buricid.gif


Sorry! I couldn't help myself! You're avatar is just....so...addictive!

Ahhhhhh! :eek: I just realized they're not dancing! They're marching! They're coming for me! Run! RUN!!!

LOL!!! :D
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad





I've got to be the dissenting opinion here. I honestly prefer the approach that d20 Modern uses. Don't get me wrong - I think Spycraft d20 is great; I was a Top Secret/S.I. fan back in the day, and I'd love to play a d20 version.

However, there's one thing I can't do in Spycraft d20 that I can do in d20 Modern - model my friends and I accurately as d20 characters. In a more traditional class structure, it's hard to pin us down - we're obviously not Fighters, Monks, Wheelmen, etc. If you track us by what we're good at, though, we break down nicely into the d20 Modern ability-focused classes.

Let's take a look at my friends and I. I figure we're old enough to be 3rd level characters.

- Dan, the big guy who's friends with everyone, to the point where random people recognize him from work; he's a Charismatic Hero 2/Strong Hero 1.

- Dennis, the techie who plays soccer, loves to drive fast, and is very lucky; he's a Smart Hero 1/Fast Hero 2.

- Seth, the writer who's easy to get along with, well-read, and knows just enough martial arts to spar dangerously; he's a Smart Hero 1/Charismatic Hero 1/Fast Hero 1, with the Martial Arts feat.

- Maggie, the aspiring comic artist who, like Dan, is well-known from work and easy to get along with, and has a heart of gold; she's a Dedicated Hero 1/Charismatic Hero 2.

- Z, my wife, an aspiring artist who's a jack-of-all-trades and has a wide circle of friends (along with a stubborn streak a mile wide :)); she's a Smart Hero 1/Charismatic Hero 1/Dedicated Hero 1.

- Finally, me, the relatively shy computer programmer who doesn't excel at any physical tasks. Smart Hero 3 all the way. :)
 


I agree, I think...
d20 modern seems more generic. Spycraft looks great to play spy games, but for, let's say, Buffy games, or X-file games, or Dark Angel games, etc. d20 modern could be better.

But I think it's too early to compare two books that haven't even been released... :)
 


Horacio said:
I agree, I think...
d20 modern seems more generic. Spycraft looks great to play spy games, but for, let's say, Buffy games, or X-file games, or Dark Angel games, etc. d20 modern could be better.

But I think it's too early to compare two books that haven't even been released... :)

I must say, I would have to disagree with this. Reading over both sets of "lite" rules, it would be possible to run a "Buffy" game, or an "X-files" -type, or even a "Dark Angel" type game using either system. It may require some work from the GM initially, but could be done easily I think. YMMV though.

And if I recall, AEG is putting out a supplement/Rulebook after the initial releases of Spycraft/Series Archer that will cover psionics and Mystics rules for the modern setting. Ah yes, in The Shadowforce Archer Worldbook, and in Shadowforce Archer RPG Sourcebook: The Archer Foundation, as well as Shadowforce Archer RPG Threat Book: The Hand of Glory . Series Archer Products list


I wasn't real thrilled with Shadowchasers, but I'll hold my say until the full D20 Modern is released. Until then, it's time to dust off the old Top Secret notes and start reworking them for use in Series Archer.
 

Remove ads

Top