ST: From 007 to ... NCC-1701???

[Mark CMG]

I do like going back to the 23rd Century but with a new ship and crew.

I could be on board with that. I'm not tied to which era, just that the characters and stories be new.

 

[Prince Atom]

Here's another vote for another ship and crew.

Shatner, Nimoy, &c. were the Kirk, Spock, &c. There can be no replacements!

On the other hand, I am not particularly interested in seeing them involved in another movie. I want something new, with a new ship (not necessarily a Constitution class) and a new crew. Hell, I wouldn't even mind 23rd-century Klingons with ridges or Romulans with pronounced temples. A new movie with Kirk and Spock is like last week's pizza.

Of course, I mean no disrespect to the actors or any of the creative team. I would just rather have something fresh.

TWK

 

[Ranger REG]

I tend to agree. DS9 was great, but it's also over.

It is unfortunate that DS9 is considered the "neglected middle child" of the franchise, mainly because Rick Berman didn't soiled it (Ira Steven Behr was lucky that Berman focused on Braga's VOYAGER than on his DS9).

But like the other poster, I do agree there is more to that storyline, like the Return of Sisko, the Dominion after the War, Cardassian-Bajoran relations(?), the still-mysterious Gamma Quad, etc.

Sure, there are novels that did continue after the TV series, but I'm already of the mindset that novels are non-canon when it comes to Trek.

 

[Ranger REG]

Here's another vote for another ship and crew.

Shatner, Nimoy, &c. were the Kirk, Spock, &c. There can be no replacements!

On the other hand, I am not particularly interested in seeing them involved in another movie. I want something new, with a new ship (not necessarily a Constitution class) and a new crew. Hell, I wouldn't even mind 23rd-century Klingons with ridges or Romulans with pronounced temples. A new movie with Kirk and Spock is like last week's pizza.

IOW, wait 'til you die before they can re-imagine the franchise?

 

[Sir Brennen]

Bond or Bourne for Kirk? AWESOME!

[...] Shatner will always be Kirk, and unless there's some spectacular revelation that Kirk is a Timelord who can morph from one actor to another, you can't convince me otherwise.

So, James Bond is a Timelord, then?

 

[Ranger REG]

So, James Bond is a Timelord, then?

Well, it would be a first to have a Timelord that is neither ugly nor homely.

 

[Pbartender]

Source: http://www.darkhorizons.com/news07/070108p.php

Though unconfirmed or unsubstantiated, it seems Matt Damon may have a good contender for the Kirk role, in the form ... ladies, I do not mean his abs ... of Daniel Craig.

Fascinating.




"Dammit, Jim! I'm a doctor, not a secret agent!"

 

[Kobold Avenger]

I more than anything want them to go back to the 24th century. They had 3 different series take place during that time, and would prefer if they went forward rather than backwards. And certainly I'd like to see some sort of epilogue to DS9 (likely having to do with the aftermath on Cardassia), since it was the best series out of those 3.

 

[Ranger REG]

"Dammit, Jim! I'm a doctor, not a secret agent!"

I don't think Mr. Craig is up for the role of "Bones" McCoy.

 

[Ranger REG]

I more than anything want them to go back to the 24th century.

Well, I don't particularly limit myself to one time period in the Star Trek Universe. I just don't want Rick Berman to be in charge.