Star Trek XI: Will they ever learn?

mojo1701 said:
I didn't mind the Remans.
I do mind. They shouldn't be there. Romulans can be its own enemy. You got two good ones: Major Sela and Tomalak. Either or both should be the leading villains with that clone actually working for them as assassins.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Orius said:
Because I and III don't really fit the pattern. TMP is fairly slow paced for a movie, but it's really more of a character movie than an action film, and it does well in that regard. The Search for Spock is one of the better Trek films, despite being odd-numbered. Some might argue about that, but the movie does tie up the loose ends left at the end of Star Trek II pretty well, and it also intorduced some pretty major Trek elements, like the Klingon Birds-of-Prey, the Klingon language, etc.

The Search for Spock is my favorite of all of the movies.
 

Ghostwind said:
If you're really interested, I can probably stick it up on my site for everyone to download. ;)

Sure, go ahead if you'd like. It sounds like it would be a hoot to watch.
 

mojo1701 said:
They weren't bad, although TMP does run a bit long. 3 wasn't bad, either. I don't understand most people's gripes about Insurrection, though.

Insurrection? That movie never happened. Nope, don't know what you're talking about. First Contact was the last TNG movie before Nemesis (which didn't happen either). In fact, there hasn't been a Star Trek movie since First Contact... what happened to that franchise?

:)
 

Tyler Do'Urden said:
Insurrection? That movie never happened. Nope, don't know what you're talking about. First Contact was the last TNG movie before Nemesis (which didn't happen either). In fact, there hasn't been a Star Trek movie since First Contact... what happened to that franchise?

:)

You people make me sick.

No, seriously, I think I caught something :).
 

qstor said:
Hopefully, its the Romulan war idea and 2. that it doesn't follow the traditon of having odd numbered ST films lay huge eggs.

That being said I did like ST 1 and 3.


Mike

However, I liked 2, 3, 4, 6. The rest are "eh" and 1 was boring as hell.
 

Khayman said:
Sort of how I feel about Voyager --- nice premise, lousy execution. But that's just me. I'm aware that some people actually liked that thing.

I liked better the original show with the same premise: Gilligan's Island.
 

David Howery said:
I found it on Not here, thanks, a file sharing system.... no link to post... I bet if you Google it, you could find it though....

And if he did post a link, then it'd get removed. Yes, it would. And also trying to give directions leads to things being deleted. As a matter of fact, I'm going to recommend all discussion of filesharing systems end, as they're you know, illegal. Thanks. --Dinkeldog
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Orius said:
Well, Nemesis went poorly, so it kind of threw the pattern out of whack:

V: Suck

And a Romulan War movie has been talked about for a while, so chances are good any future Trek movie will touch upon that. Hiring an outsider who knows little about Trek might not be the greatest idea, they did that with X, and I think that helped it to flop (well, the lame-ass plot certainly tanked the movie thouroughly too.) But then people who've worked on Trek for a while (I need not mention any names, since someone else will anyway) haven't exactly been delivering quality Trek lately, so fresh blood for a movie might help too.

See, and I really liked V. It was very TOS, sure. It had some very cool Roddenberry-type social messages that a lot of people would be uncomfortable with, and I'm cool with that, too.
 

Just a little note...posting a link to the talked about file shouldn't be a problem at all, as its fan made and no different than a bunch of the other crazy things we see here. Its not like posting a full Star Trek movie.

Of course, filesharing programs is a different matter altogether...
 

Remove ads

Top