Steve Jobs resigns as Apple CEO

I bought an iPhone back in November. I love it, but it is also the first/only smart phone I've ever owned, so I have nothing to compare it to. (It's not a matter of "I love the iPhone," it's more, "I love what I can do with this kind of electronics, regardless of who made it.")

Before that, I had never owned anything Apple. About 10 years ago, I used a Mac computer for my work -- that's what my department used -- for about 2 years.

Other than this, I've never cared one whit about Apple. I was never a fanboy nor a hater of the company or products. I had absolutely no care about it one way or another. But I'll be first to admit that Apple has been "successful" and it seems that Jobs is a major part of that success.

Bullgrit
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I am a fanboy and have been since Grade 2 when I sat at a green-screen Apple and programmed a crossword puzzle and an external turtle to move around the room. Jobs is a major a-hole. He's my idol and will be missed.

*sniff*
 

I'm not really sure exactly what Steve Jobs brought to the table at Apple.

I suspect Woz was the brains behind the original Apple computer.

And Apple without Jobs floundered. So he did something.

When people talk about Jobs' Reality Distortion Field, it sounds like the way he talked about what a product COULD be like set the direction for what it WOULD be like.

In effect Jobs' contribution was that he KNEW what kind of product would really sell, and how that product should look and feel to get that appeal. With Jobs at the helm of Apple, he could put that power to use, guiding the company to build more appealing products.

If Jobs was the god of the hipsters, it is because he intrinsically knew what would appeal to hipsters. Thus, his products appealed to them.

Apple has some product lines to tap before they need "the next big thing."

It'll be pretty easy to keep pumping out better iPhones, iPods and iPads for a few years.

What happens after that, without Steve?

Hard to say. Consider the iPod. Do you really think Steve woke up and thought of that himself? The portable MP3 player is a no-brainer product. digital music files, smaller digital medias, and the Sony Walkman are all you need as concepts to think of a portable digital music player. Odds are good, the iPod wasn't even the first product on the market. So all Steve did was take the idea and issue orders to make it look good and run well.

That's all the new CEO of Apple has to do. Either himself, or people under him just need Steve's sense of style and featureset to keep making homeruns out of technologies that are emerging.
 

Three things which are good about this announcement:

1. iFad naming convention will die soon.
No chance. While it may have once been a Jobs thing, it's now intimately tied with the Apple brand, the world's most valuable.

2. People will realize that Steve Jobs' brilliance was overrated.
Hardly. Like Ford, Edison, Gates, and many other company founders considered to be brilliant, he will only be held in more and more esteem as time passes.
 

I'm not really sure exactly what Steve Jobs brought to the table at Apple.

Love him or loathe him, his impact not only on Apple's success but popular culture is undeniable. Anyone who says otherwise is just being argumentative and is probably jealous.

What did he bring to Apple? Well, aside from being a literal genius, he brought a vision. He didn't want to run a company that just made electronic products. He wanted a company that changed the world with its electronic products. He wanted to produce things that changed people's lives. He wanted to produce things that were both aesthetically pleasing and easy to use. One of Apple's underlying design philosophies has always been to create products that the work for the consumer, not against them.

The perfect example of this is the iPod. The iPod was a late-comer to the portable digital music market. There were already several companies producing several lines of MP3 players. What Apple did different (yes, that's incorrectly spelled on purpose), was to make the devices consumer friendly. That's all. Hell, on paper the devices weren't even that spectacular, often having much lower storage capacity and fewer features. But they made the product work FOR the consumer and not against them.

That simple design philosophy was what sparked the revolution. Suddenly everyone and their dog could figure out how to use an iPod and subsequently wanted one. And they did exactly the same thing with the iPhone. Entire businesses switched from Blackberries to iPhones over night, something which businesses are loathe to do, simply because iPhones were far easier to use and their employees actually used them instead of fumbling around pretending to.

Of course, as an Apple fan, I've always felt that the MacOS was easier to use than Windows, it just took the iPod, iPhone and iPad for everyone else to realise it as well :D

Now did Steve do all of this by himself? Hell no. But after being kicked out of Apple, he was forced to become less of an arrogant bastard and more of an accomplished businessman. And the first lesson he learned in order to succeed, was to surround himself with brilliant people. And thus was born Next and Pixar.

When he finally came back to Apple, it was in a shambles because the whole company had lost sight of that original vision. It had turned into just another computer company, producing just another computer, and given that it was competing against a more popular brand, it offered very little reason to buy it.

Steve had also become not only a master businessman, but also a master salesman in his time away. And so he fired half of Apple (literally, there was a period where Apple employees feared getting into an elevator with Jobs because they knew there was a good chance they'd end up unemployed by the time they got out) and employed most of his Next buddies and some of his Pixar buddies. And of course he'd made a lot of friends in other areas too like the CEO of Oracle and Google and brought them on board as well.

He changed the culture of Apple into one of dedication, passion and obsession. His employment philosophy was that if you didn't love what you were doing and didn't want to dedicate your every waking moment to doing it, then why should he employ you?

Like or hate Apple products, like or hate Steve Jobs, I think it's hard for anyone to legitimately claim that he isn't a brilliant man.
 


1. iFad naming convention will die soon.

Complete Crap!

ipood-500x382.jpg


:p
 




Remove ads

Top