Swiftly House Ruling Complete Spells for Adventuring

ThaDium · Mar 25, 2005

So, I'm thinking of saying that if you know the "swift" version of a spell, you know the regular version as well. Having invisability, but not swift invisability makes sense, but why anyone would chose swift invis over the regular version is beyond me. This mostly impacts PrC's and sorcerers, as mages get tons of spells anyway.

Thoughts?

Angel Tarragon · Mar 25, 2005

Sounds pretty good to me. It makes sense.

palleomortis · Apr 14, 2005

Not a clue. I would just a soon stay as a normal invisible being.

comrade raoul · Apr 14, 2005

What if you resolved it with feats, instead? Perhaps a character with a normal version of the spell and the Quicken Spell feat could prepare (or spontaneously cast) the "swift" version instead, rather than the normal version at an increased level.

This would also give sorcerers and other spontaneous characters a reason to take Quicken Spell.