The Tabletop Adventure Sues Geek Therapeutics For 'Libel, Slander, and Copyright Infringement'

Shawn Thomas of The Tabletop Adventure is suing Geek Therapeutics and its founder, Dr. Anthony Bean, for "libel, slander and copyright infringement".

Realms of Kymoria Cropped.png

Shawn Thomas of The Tabletop Adventure is suing Geek Therapeutics and its founder, Dr. Anthony Bean, for "libel, slander and copyright infringement" over Realms of Kymoria, according to the Iowa Capital Dispatch (ICD). Shawn authored Realms of Kymoria, and discussed manufacturing, marketing, and distributing the setting with Geek Therapeutics. "Despite the alleged lack of a finalized licensing agreement between Thomas and the Texas company, Geek Therapeutics launched a Kickstarter crowd-funding campaign to get Realms of Kymoria to market."

The active campaign is live on Backerkit, not Kickstarter, though there is a Kickstarter "coming soon" launch page. ICD's original article offers details reprinted in its entirety here via ICD's use of Creative Commons:

A “certified therapeutic game master” from Iowa is suing a Texas company called Geek Therapeutics for libel, slander and copyright infringement over a planned Dungeons & Dragons spinoff.

Shawn Thomas and his Ankeny company [The] Tabletop Adventure are suing Geek Therapeutics and its founder, Dr. Anthony Bean, a licensed psychologist, in U.S. District Court for Southern District of Iowa.

The lawsuit revolves around Thomas’ development of a role-playing tabletop game called Realms of Kymoria. The lawsuit claims that players of the game inhabit a fictional world that provides an inclusive and welcoming environment for all types of individuals.

Thomas alleges that in creating Realms of Kymoria, he produced graphical maps, stories in the form of written prose, and graphic depictions of various characters within those stories. In 2021, he created a limited liability company, [The] Tabletop Adventure, to hold the copyrights, trademarks, and other rights associated with the game.

That same year, the lawsuit alleges, Thomas acquired his “therapeutic game master certification” from Geek Therapeutics, signaling his ability to host role-playing games in therapeutic environments. Soon thereafter, Thomas and Bean allegedly began discussing a potential licensing agreement whereby Geek Therapeutics would manufacture, market, and distribute Realms of Kymoria.

The lawsuit alleges Thomas was concerned about losing control of the intellectual property rights associated with the game and that Bean agreed all such rights would remain with Thomas. Negotiations continued through December 2022, when it was learned that a California company called Wizards of the Coast was planning major changes in its licensing agreements that allow third parties to create games using rules that are compatible with its popular Dungeons & Dragons role-playing game.

Among the planned changes was one that would grant to Wizards of the Coast a perpetual royalty-free license to use the officially licensed third-party games for any purpose. The lawsuit claims this plan triggered “an uproar in the tabletop gaming community” because many game developers had created business models centered on their compatibility with Dungeons & Dragons rules.

Thomas was among the concerned developers because he had intended to make Realms of Kymoria compatible with Dungeons & Dragons, but was opposed to the Wizards of the Coast licensing arrangement, according to the lawsuit.

Geek Therapeutics, however, opted to pursue compatibility and it moved forward with its marketing plans for Realms of Kymoria. Despite the alleged lack of a finalized licensing agreement between Thomas and the Texas company, Geek Therapeutics launched a Kickstarter crowd-funding campaign to get Realms of Kymoria to market. In April 2023, Thomas allegedly demanded that Geek Therapeutics immediately cease all efforts to reproduce and distribute his game.

According to the lawsuit, Geek Therapeutics announced, earlier this month, plans to distribute and sell the game through its Kickstarter campaign. “Hundreds of people have pre-registered” to provide support for the game, the lawsuit claims, and various websites and merchandise have been created to promote and sell the game.

In addition to an injunction, Thomas’ lawsuit seeks damages for copyright infringement as well as libel and slander, with Thomas alleging the defendants sent its Kickstart backers a supportive email that falsely claimed to be from him.

The defendants have yet to file a response to the lawsuit.


Realms of Kymoria A Therapeutic TTRPG Quickstart Kit for 5e.png
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Egg Embry

Egg Embry


log in or register to remove this ad

Dire Bare

Legend
The idea that neurodivergent individuals are predominant in the RPG hobby is a bold statement that requires some citation to back up.
Really? You need a study?

Just pay attention to the conversations on this forum!

I'm not sure I've ever met someone in the hobby who isn't on the spectrum to some degree, myself included.
 


MGibster

Legend
Really? You need a study?

Just pay attention to the conversations on this forum!
Really, I need a study. People who post on message boards like this are a self-selecting group and hardly indicative of gamers in general. And even then, I see no evidence to suggest the neurotypical aren't, well, typical.

I'm not sure I've ever met someone in the hobby who isn't on the spectrum to some degree, myself included.
I'm not sure I've ever met someone in the hobby who was on the spectrum. Keeping in mind that nobody knew what the "the spectrum" was when I started gaming.
 

Neurodiverse gamers are extremely common and a large part of the hobby but I'd be surprised if we were the majority. That would need a lot of backing up.

I wouldn't even assume that neurodiverse gamers are a majority on forums, to say anything else about online spaces in general.

I definitely think it's reasonable to say neurodiverse people are a much higher percentage of the population of tabletop gamers than they are among the general population however. You'd need a study to state that explicitly but I feel as if it's probable.
 


Dire Bare

Legend
putting aside that enworld is absolutely not representative of the wider rpg community, i'm gonna ask you to clarify what you mean by this, because to me it sounds BAD. like, it sounds REALLY BAD.
Clarify? I thought I was pretty clear. Obviously, not everyone agrees with me, but that's okay.

The tabletop RPG hobby, in my opinion, has a high percentage of folks on the spectrum. There's nothing wrong with that, or with us, it's just part of the nature of our hobby and what attracts us to it.

If that doesn't match your experience, or you simply don't agree . . . that's fine. Acting like I'm somehow slandering our hobby or the fine folks on this forum, that's a bit much, however.

There's nothing wrong with being neurodivergent or "on the spectrum", we're not less than, we're different.
 

Clarify? I thought I was pretty clear. Obviously, not everyone agrees with me, but that's okay.

The tabletop RPG hobby, in my opinion, has a high percentage of folks on the spectrum. There's nothing wrong with that, or with us, it's just part of the nature of our hobby and what attracts us to it.

If that doesn't match your experience, or you simply don't agree . . . that's fine. Acting like I'm somehow slandering our hobby or the fine folks on this forum, that's a bit much, however.

There's nothing wrong with being neurodivergent or "on the spectrum", we're not less than, we're different.
but you really WEREN'T clear. you just said "look at conversations on this forum" - you never elaborated WHAT about conversations on this forum should lead us to agree with you. that's what i was asking about - because you know what I think of when i think about conversations i've had on this forum?

i think of very passionate people going into detail discussing various topics, usually related to their hobbies and the best ways to go about conducting them. so if that's supposed to make me see that most people on enworld are neurodivergent...well, there's only two implications i can think to take away from that. either only neurodivergent people would bother to be passionate about their hobbies, or neurotypical people are incapable of being passionate about their hobbies (or BOTH, if we wanna make things really bad). i hope you can see how neither of these implications are good, and thus why i asked you to clarify what you meant. because i DON'T think you meant to imply EITHER of those things, but i really don't know what else you might mean.
 


aramis erak

Legend
Neurodiverse gamers are extremely common and a large part of the hobby but I'd be surprised if we were the majority. That would need a lot of backing up.

I wouldn't even assume that neurodiverse gamers are a majority on forums, to say anything else about online spaces in general.

I definitely think it's reasonable to say neurodiverse people are a much higher percentage of the population of tabletop gamers than they are among the general population however. You'd need a study to state that explicitly but I feel as if it's probable.
Considering "Neurodivergent" covers the Autism spectrum (Asperger's Syndrome to Low Functioning Autism), ADD/ADHD, Dyslexia, Scotopic Sensitivity, and at least half a dozen other neuroperceptive disorders...

It's also been adopted by a number of sufferers of Bipolar and certain other mood disorders, as well, but I don't know how widespread that use is.

Further, it's often used as a more politically correct substitution for "learning disabled," "Special Needs," "differentially abled," or "Special Education student."

In my current groups (total 10 players plus myself, plus 2 more occasional drop ins), EVERY member has a diagnosis compatible with the term "Neurodivergent"... Myself included. (ADHD, Dyslexia, Bipolar, provisional diagnosis of HFA.)
The least diagnosed individual has ADHD and dysgraphia.
The most diagnosed? ADHD, dyslexia, HFA, gender dysphoria, bipolar.

And that isn't counting that 6 of the 13 of us have migraine issues - which are presumptively a brain disorder.

We've openly discussed our neurodivergences in both groups.

Both my kids have ADHD and Bipolar.

I'd be surprised if more than half are not in some way "neurodivergent"... but actual autism spectrum? well, since my kids aren't counted in that bakers dozen, 4 of us are on the Autism spectrum. One's suspected to be but not diagnosed. Both my kids are on the spectrum, have bipolar as well, and migraines.

I'd not be surprised if 1 in five were on the autism spectrum, but "neurodivergent" isn't a synonym for On the Spectrum.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top