Tell us about FFG's new Path books!

[Psion]

They Fey class seemed to apply more to anyone who dealt with Fey.

Whoa.

A class called "children of the woods is not druidic how?

And a class dealing with weather and storms is not druidic how?

Looked at it real quick when I went home for lunch -- there was also a master of hounds class -- once again perfectly in-line with the concept of a druid in D&D.

Anything dealing with Gods is cleric in my book and not Druid. Druids don't need to deal with the Gods at all unless they're in FR which punishes anyone who tries to find alternate means of dealing with spirituatly...

Not touching that can of worms again...

 

[Mark Chance]

But I Wish I Had...

First thing I said to Greg when he listed this one off was "Please tell me Mark Chance didn't write this one!

Of course, I wish had thought of it. Would've been a wonderful inside joke.

I did use a few names of PCs active in my current campaign, however. For example, there is a Than PC in my group who belongs to a custom class that I used as the basis of the Ossorus PrC.

 

[Tyrrell]

Wil, I noticed that the school rules in the newer two books were unchanged from the rules in sword and magic. Weren't you intending on changing them a bit? Did you change your mind?

 

[d20Dwarf]

Wil, I noticed that the school rules in the newer two books were unchanged from the rules in sword and magic. Weren't you intending on changing them a bit? Did you change your mind?

Yeah, we talked about it a bit, and I decided that since the majority of users had no problems with them as written that to change them midstream wouldn't be a good idea.

Hey, why am I telling you this? You could just ask Greg on Wednesday damn you!