You think your character is 33% suck? I'm sorry.der_kluge said:I have a Cloistered Cleric 1 / Bard 1 / Rogue 1 in a PbP game.
But, really, I can't think of any good reason to take any more levels of Bard. Bards suck, IMHO.
Felix said:You think your character is 33% suck? I'm sorry.![]()
To be fair, characters of every class are encouraged to specialize and Bards feel that pressure too; as a class that can cover most any role (scout, healer, combatant, spellcaster) it has a hard time when it comes to the decision to specialize or generalize.der_kluge said:They are very focused classes in 3rd edition. Nothing "Jack-of-all-trades" about them at all anymore.
the Jester said:I once played a really fun bard named Sarcastro, whose whole schtick was insulting humor and ethnic jokes.
Yeah, bards should be second rate rogues in regard to traps. They are tricksters and skillmonkeys, I really don't understand why the assassintype rogue class has to be the single class who can do that. Except for clerics (which doesn't make sense at all!).der_kluge said:Well, what frustrates me with the bard is that you can't use levels of bard as the "jack-of-all-trades" that they used to be in 2nd edition. I miss that. They are very focused classes in 3rd edition. Nothing "Jack-of-all-trades" about them at all anymore.
My character is basically sort of crazy, and dabbles in things. I had to take a level of rogue to pick up things like open locks and disable device. The GM was letting me stacked the Cloistered Cleric and the Bard's "Lore" abilities which was handy. And since bless replicates Inspire Courage, there's not really any reason to take levels of Bard. If I wanted to enchant people, I'd play a Sorcerer.