thalmin
Retired game store owner
OK, the thread is up, and here is the link.mhacdebhandia said:Damn it, man, post a catalogue thread again!![]()
OK, the thread is up, and here is the link.mhacdebhandia said:Damn it, man, post a catalogue thread again!![]()
JoeGKushner said:I feel like I'm being spammed by bad fiction in spell descriptions that are longer than the spells themselves!
BelenUmeria said:Well, my point is that there are so many other books that could be done rather than a Complete Mage. It is all so tiresome to see what looks like th same thing over and over and over again. I would rather see the "Complete Armor" or the "Complete Equipment"
Mouseferatu said:I agree, it would. I imagine we'll see such a thing as one of the compiled lists on the WotC web site eventually.![]()
green slime said:Well Ari, it has to be said, that in general I feel that 3.5 seems to be suffering from a rules/supplement bloat the like of which I've never seen before (including 2e).
I'll probably get the title, because I'm a DnD addict, but I can't possibly say I'm in the least bit excited. In fact, in the longer term, this is probably going to kill the hobby for me. Its hard to get excited about yet another "Complete" when I still have so much unread (nevermind unused) material from a huge pile of other books. IMO, WotC really needs to sit down and think a lot harder about producing fewer, high quality products.
My current frustrations are the immense page count used to describe each PrC, the "meh" factor in a lot of the recent feats (CPsi, & PHB2), and spells I can no longer even be bothered to read through. My time is limited, and I find PrC fluff excessive to the extreme.
This isn't to say that the Complete book you are working on isn't fantastic, incredible, must-have tome of RPG-ing happiness. I'm just expressing my concerns.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.