Um, yes? A successful money grab?If enough people go to see it to make it profitable is it really a money grab?
Um, yes? A successful money grab?If enough people go to see it to make it profitable is it really a money grab?
Some of us enjoy the cinema experience.But given that lots of people have home theaters and the $2 you'd need to buy it from Goodwill, I don't see why anyone would see it in the cinema.
Yep. It’s definitely a different vibe.Some of us enjoy the cinema experience.
I think of it as "Sibyl Buck's Fifth Element," but that's just me.I think this is the first time I've ever seen the Fifth Element called "Gary Oldman's". I've definitely seen "Luc Besson's" and probably "Bruce Willis's". Maybe even "Mila Jovovich's". But Gary's? He's great in it and all, but definitely not the first name I think of.
As far as I can tell, Disney bought 20th/21st Century Fox films - not Fox Television. The difference probably has something to do with negative charges repelling each other.Funny you should say that. When Disney bought Fox they immediately rescinded availability of secondary market rights to show older flicks. Hurt many small city cinemas![]()
Volume, for starters. Games and theaters are super-loud, which probably triggers some hormone for excitement. Plus, there's the whole idea of humans worshiping big things, and the big screen probably plays into that a bit.going to the game still has a special feel to it.
Na, Disney got the film and TV rights. It’s Fox News that remained its own thing.I think of it as "Sibyl Buck's Fifth Element," but that's just me.
As far as I can tell, Disney bought 20th/21st Century Fox films - not Fox Television. The difference probably has something to do with negative charges repelling each other.
I get to go rematch the cinematic masterpiece The Mummy on a movie screen as every god Benny invoked intended every other year or so.Isn't every movie shown in a theater a money grab thing?