The Four Lands Forum

[Scott DeWar]

I bet Scotley might. and what about Lou?

 

[J. Alexander]

Hmmm

Well I am not adverse to pathfinder...but i guess if the consesus is a no go i will just restart one or two of the old ones...

any ideas

 

[J. Alexander]

Back into the woodwork lol

HMMM
okay seems like it best if i just delay the return....best of luck

 

[Scotley]

Well I am not adverse to pathfinder...but i guess if the consesus is a no go i will just restart one or two of the old ones...

any ideas

I think most of the folks who will find your game appealing are going to be more inclined to Pathfinder than 4e. I'm certainly interested either way. One of the good things about Pathfinder is that pretty much everything you need to play can be found here:

Pathfinder_OGC

 

[Scott DeWar]

not to mention the ease of conversion from a 3.5 idea.

 

[Rhun]

I think most of the folks who will find your game appealing are going to be more inclined to Pathfinder than 4e. I'm certainly interested either way. One of the good things about Pathfinder is that pretty much everything you need to play can be found here:

Pathfinder_OGC

I would certainly be inclined to play if the game was Pathfinder as opposed to 4E.

 

[Lou]

Stupid Blackberry--

I'm in.

JA-sure about 4e instead of Pathfinder?

Should I play a druid? I'm thinking perhaps a sorceror....

 

[Leif]

Like Scotley and Lou, count me in no matter what rule-system you choose to use! What some of these others may not realize yet is that no matter the system, JA's game is going to be uniquely JA's game! Meaning that stuff won't always necessarily work exactly like you think or the books say it should, IF such a result does not mesh well with JA's overarching evil campaign plan.

 

[Rhun]

Like Scotley and Lou, count me in no matter what rule-system you choose to use! What some of these others may not realize yet is that no matter the system, JA's game is going to be uniquely JA's game! Meaning that stuff won't always necessarily work exactly like you think or the books say it should, IF such a result does not mesh well with JA's overarching evil campaign plan.

Oh, I realize it will be uniquely JA. I just haven't seen anything in 4E yet that has demonstrated any advantage over Pathfinder.

 

[Neurotic]

I would play whatever, 3.5, Pathfinder, 4E, old stories, new stories, those marshal ideas you never started, anything.

I'm familiar with all of them with Pathfinder being a bit behind because I'm not playing it regularly (two campaigns, both converted from 3.5 (duskblade and swordsage, not really PF classes)