Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad
Wasn't intending to mock you but multiclassing changes things a lot. Do you dispute that the charisma based MC characters have more options than the wizard? Theres to many variables as well once MCing enters the mix.
New Paladin and Ranger offers some interesting possibilities though. Great dip levels.
Some other things.
You're aware Treantmonk kinda gets mocked elsewhere along with Colby at d4? I know you like them and reference them a lot.
I am mocking whoever is mocking them. I suspect it's d-bags at Reddit. Treatmonk like's wizards for control. That's his whole thing. He literally doesn't even like fireball, or most direct damage wizard spells. Even a passing familiarity with his takes on wizards would tell you that.
As for Colby, I enjoy his videos but I don't like a lot of his builds and never referenced them for wizards.
Treantmonk builds also kinda suck. He's decent for guidelines fir say strikers and he's not even that goid at building them.
I disagree. Also, I think your builds usually suck. But then we've had this debate before. Your table seems meaningfully different from any of the dozens of tables I've played at before. You guys have weird assumptions built into your game which very few have. It skews your perspective.
.
Latest video he's using only 2024 material. He wanted to add hex to his build but wasn't using 2014 material. Much like Treantmonk he doesn't know you can 2024 phb. Yet another bad build. Much like Treantmonk. I mock those guys because theyre bad@game or at least not as good as they think they are.
I have no idea why you're quoting d4, but Treantmonk's builds tend to be pretty good, particularly for wizards. And I find your builds tend to be terrible and unrealistic for most tables. I guess everyone's preferences are different.