Revenge of the Bjorn
First Post
S'mon said:The Worship Points System as conceived by me uses the 'Ascending' or 'Democratic' theory of power, where power derives fundamentally from the lowest element, the belief of the ordinary, mundane human being. This belief-energy powers the multiverse, creates and empowers the gods, etc. It draws from democratic-influenced mythologies such as that of the Greeks, where the gods clearly draw power from their worshippers - power that enables them to become mightier than Elder entities such as the Titans.
The opposing theory of power (whether magical or political) is the 'Descending' or 'Hierarchic' theory, where power flows downwards from powerful beings with an a-priori divine existence to their lesser minions. This theory fits with most Judaeo-Christian doctrine and is exemplified in the works of JRR Tolkien - Iluvatar is the pre-existing divinity from which all power flows, He empowers lower levels down the chain. So Melkor initially receives the largest lump of divine power, but spends so much of it on empowering his minions that he eventually becomes weaker than the Valar who have hoarded theirs more carefully. The OD&D Immortals system also seems closer to the Hierarchic approach.
This explains why rhe idea of power from worship never appealed to me, I subscribe to the second view, with all divinity coming from a single source (cough*The Source*cough*ripping off Kirby[and Taoism and other stuff]*cough) Although with my opinion that there is a semi-non-living source, how would power be distributed...hrrm.
Although today I had a funny idea today of God running for reelection (with an actual physical ballot being taken), and various, deities, demons, angels, and/or people running against the Divine. You can just imagine the campaign speeches. Yeah, I have way too much free time. But I certainly think it could make an interesting campaign.