The Immortals Handbook

[CRGreathouse]

Using WotCs system...I didn't really want to scare people by starting the list at (a revised) CR 31.

Thanks, I appreciate that; I know WotC's system pretty well, and it 'registers' for me.

Good communication is important.

Which ones [will CRGreathouse not use]? The Angels?

Golems don't exist in my world, so that's 5 right off the bat; I almost never use oozes as creatures (as opposed to hazards), so the Prismatic Pudding seems unlikely to see the light of my world's day.

I presume these [creatures that CRGreathouse already uses] would be the likes of Asmodeus and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse?

I sort of wanted to have something familiar in there to give people a guideline.

I use malakim, cherubim/"kerubim", ophanim, seraphim, and gregori from Sean Reynolds' Anger of Angels.

I don't use the whole WotC diobolic/demonic collection including Asmodeus, but using your stats for a powerful unique devil will be easy enough.

 

[Knight Otu]

I see that you are back to using the name Cosmocrat?

 

[Fieari]

Bestiary looks great. Looking forewards to seeing Cherabim that live up to the source material. But most of all, I'm really hoping that the "Fall 2004" release date remains accurate.

 

[Zoatebix]

Oh. My. God.

That's one heck of a creature list. So where do I sign up? You know, to buy one.

 

[Anabstercorian]

I was going to ask a big confusing question about all the monsters.

But then I decided to say that

YOUR CHOICE IS STILL CLEAR

If you write it we will buy!

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hi CRGreathouse mate!

Thanks, I appreciate that; I know WotC's system pretty well, and it 'registers' for me.

Good communication is important.

Golems don't exist in my world, so that's 5 right off the bat; I almost never use oozes as creatures (as opposed to hazards), so the Prismatic Pudding seems unlikely to see the light of my world's day.

Well you could have warned me! Didn't see any of that coming.

I use malakim, cherubim/"kerubim", ophanim, seraphim, and gregori from Sean Reynolds' Anger of Angels.

I don't (as yet) have that supplement - though I am of course interested in the material.

Franky though I don't jive with this whole Divine Rank 0 glass ceiling for Demon Lords, Archdevils or in this case ArchAngels. I can see why Sean designed them that way (for non-epic material) but frankly it does nothing for me and I dislike this whole 'powerful outsiders automatically serve the gods' baloney which you are forced to instigate as a result.

I don't use the whole WotC diobolic/demonic collection including Asmodeus, but using your stats for a powerful unique devil will be easy enough.

My interpretation isn't exactly your standard 'D&D' Asmodeus anyway.

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hey Knight Otu mate!

I see that you are back to using the name Cosmocrat?

I thought you would notice that, Chronocrat(er) was okay but didn't make any sense (Time Builder) when translated.

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hi Fieari mate!

Bestiary looks great. Looking forewards to seeing Cherabim that live up to the source material.

Do you mean the 133 HD 'Kerubim'?

But most of all, I'm really hoping that the "Fall 2004" release date remains accurate.

Absolutely.

 

[Upper_Krust]

Howdy Zoatebix matey!

Oh. My. God.

That's one heck of a creature list.

Thanks, but remember there are still two others to be added to that list.

So where do I sign up? You know, to buy one.

Just keep your money a few weeks longer and I'll be ready.

 

[Upper_Krust]

Hiya mate!

I was going to ask a big confusing question about all the monsters.

Ask away mate. Your question may indirectly help me, and I always welcome feedback (even that of the pre release variety).

But then I decided to say that

YOUR CHOICE IS STILL CLEAR

If you write it we will buy!

I'm writing, I'm writing.