Leif
Adventurer
Color me suitably thrilled. (Which isn't necessarily saying a great deal...)You'll all be thrilled to know that I watched "Walking Dead" last night on the ole DVR and it was pretty good.
Color me suitably thrilled. (Which isn't necessarily saying a great deal...)You'll all be thrilled to know that I watched "Walking Dead" last night on the ole DVR and it was pretty good.
a question of "do you play d and d?"
Exactly.. I mean hell according to that flowchart I should not be posting here (since I assume it was based on enworld) because I play m&m 2e.Well that's a dumb question.
HM
I don't use CB's when I make characters so I can't comment or speculate. I just put them on paper then type them up. As I have made about 20-30 characters in the past year (and checked over nearly as many). I rarely find a mistake and if I do it is fixable before posting.
Now I can help WD with his card drawing question. If I were to do it I would have a post with the cards are listed and numbered and then leave everything up to good old IC (they seem to torment players pretty good) and you can roll odd dice on IC like a d52 for your standard card deck and what not.
Would be alot of work to type all the cards and what they do in, but you could search around and see if someone hasn't already done it somewhere, and then copy paste from that site.
HM
_
We could argue about the different editions of M&M (including (DC A).Exactly.. I mean hell according to that flowchart I should not be posting here (since I assume it was based on enworld) because I play m&m 2e.
This data transmission was sent via cybernetic implant.
I don't think I ever opened up M&M 1e, however I believe that I have the book.... somewhere.We could argue about the different editions of M&M (including (DC A).
I like M&M 2nd more than 1st, but 1st is more compatible with 'mainstream' d20.
From my brief read through of DC A there wasn't much about DC A that I didn't like or thought was problematic (the change in devices would take some betting use to). Unfortunately since I don't have a table group I haven't really been motivated to create any characters, especially because no one on ENWorld seems to be interested in segmenting the board's small M&M community by starting a 3e recruitment thread.DC A looks better than both, but lacks the amount of sourcebook and the incorporated errata the previous editions.
Let's the M&M edition war begin!
I think exactly the same. I want to try it out in the future, but currently enjoying the seemingly revival of M&M 2nd on the PbP forum.... especially because no one on ENWorld seems to be interested in segmenting the board's small M&M community by starting a 3e recruitment thread.
Then again, I think people are waiting for the official M&M 3e Players Handbook and the 3e Ultimate Power-like Book to be released before they do.
I don't think I ever opened up M&M 1e, however I believe that I have the book.... somewhere.
From my brief read through of DC A there wasn't much about DC A that I didn't like or thought was problematic (the change in devices would take some betting use to). Unfortunately since I don't have a table group I haven't really been motivated to create any characters, especially because no one on ENWorld seems to be interested in segmenting the board's small M&M community by starting a 3e recruitment thread.
Then again, I think people are waiting for the official M&M 3e Players Handbook and the 3e Ultimate Power-like Book to be released before they do.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.