tonym
First Post
LordBOB said:... not a single answer will be totally right, since everyone has thier own views. ( just my view)
Actually, one side can win the argument here. The DM is the judge. If the DM judges the paladin's behavior evil and strips away the paladin's powers, the Jim Hague side wins. If the DM doesn't, that means Heironmous agrees with me and our side wins.
Miscellaneous repurcussions that are not dealt from the the hand of Heironeous also mean our side wins.
Now read the DM's quote...
Galfridus said:One of the reasons I have mitigated my initial assessment of the "evilness" of the paladin's actions is campaign history...plus the fact that the paladin's past history involves a lot of chaos and not much evil, has me thinking along Law-Chaos lines rather than Good-Evil lines.
There you have it. The paladin was not evil. He was chaotic. Ergo, the DM will not have Heironeous strip away the paladin's powers.
Me and Dannyalcatraz and the other guys on our side win! WOOO!

Tony M