jbear
First Post
I'm just going to take issue with the title of the thread.
I've played since AD&D. Played 3.5 and 4e. By far my coolest campaign was the one I ran was using 4e. There are other factors independent of the system involved like my age, the time I invested in it over a sustained period of time and my players for example that made the campaign so memorable.
But nonetheless the campaign was incredibly cool. I found nothing limiting about the system. Adding flavour I wished to be present was a matter of the greatest simplicity. So, as far as I am concerned stating that 4e is only good at X or Y is more of a reflection of the abilities of the person making the statement and not the limitations of the system.
I've played since AD&D. Played 3.5 and 4e. By far my coolest campaign was the one I ran was using 4e. There are other factors independent of the system involved like my age, the time I invested in it over a sustained period of time and my players for example that made the campaign so memorable.
But nonetheless the campaign was incredibly cool. I found nothing limiting about the system. Adding flavour I wished to be present was a matter of the greatest simplicity. So, as far as I am concerned stating that 4e is only good at X or Y is more of a reflection of the abilities of the person making the statement and not the limitations of the system.