The Tabletop Adventure Sues Geek Therapeutics For 'Libel, Slander, and Copyright Infringement'

Realms of Kymoria Cropped.png

Shawn Thomas of The Tabletop Adventure is suing Geek Therapeutics and its founder, Dr. Anthony Bean, for "libel, slander and copyright infringement" over Realms of Kymoria, according to the Iowa Capital Dispatch (ICD). Shawn authored Realms of Kymoria, and discussed manufacturing, marketing, and distributing the setting with Geek Therapeutics. "Despite the alleged lack of a finalized licensing agreement between Thomas and the Texas company, Geek Therapeutics launched a Kickstarter crowd-funding campaign to get Realms of Kymoria to market."

The active campaign is live on Backerkit, not Kickstarter, though there is a Kickstarter "coming soon" launch page. ICD's original article offers details reprinted in its entirety here via ICD's use of Creative Commons:

A “certified therapeutic game master” from Iowa is suing a Texas company called Geek Therapeutics for libel, slander and copyright infringement over a planned Dungeons & Dragons spinoff.

Shawn Thomas and his Ankeny company [The] Tabletop Adventure are suing Geek Therapeutics and its founder, Dr. Anthony Bean, a licensed psychologist, in U.S. District Court for Southern District of Iowa.

The lawsuit revolves around Thomas’ development of a role-playing tabletop game called Realms of Kymoria. The lawsuit claims that players of the game inhabit a fictional world that provides an inclusive and welcoming environment for all types of individuals.

Thomas alleges that in creating Realms of Kymoria, he produced graphical maps, stories in the form of written prose, and graphic depictions of various characters within those stories. In 2021, he created a limited liability company, [The] Tabletop Adventure, to hold the copyrights, trademarks, and other rights associated with the game.

That same year, the lawsuit alleges, Thomas acquired his “therapeutic game master certification” from Geek Therapeutics, signaling his ability to host role-playing games in therapeutic environments. Soon thereafter, Thomas and Bean allegedly began discussing a potential licensing agreement whereby Geek Therapeutics would manufacture, market, and distribute Realms of Kymoria.

The lawsuit alleges Thomas was concerned about losing control of the intellectual property rights associated with the game and that Bean agreed all such rights would remain with Thomas. Negotiations continued through December 2022, when it was learned that a California company called Wizards of the Coast was planning major changes in its licensing agreements that allow third parties to create games using rules that are compatible with its popular Dungeons & Dragons role-playing game.

Among the planned changes was one that would grant to Wizards of the Coast a perpetual royalty-free license to use the officially licensed third-party games for any purpose. The lawsuit claims this plan triggered “an uproar in the tabletop gaming community” because many game developers had created business models centered on their compatibility with Dungeons & Dragons rules.

Thomas was among the concerned developers because he had intended to make Realms of Kymoria compatible with Dungeons & Dragons, but was opposed to the Wizards of the Coast licensing arrangement, according to the lawsuit.

Geek Therapeutics, however, opted to pursue compatibility and it moved forward with its marketing plans for Realms of Kymoria. Despite the alleged lack of a finalized licensing agreement between Thomas and the Texas company, Geek Therapeutics launched a Kickstarter crowd-funding campaign to get Realms of Kymoria to market. In April 2023, Thomas allegedly demanded that Geek Therapeutics immediately cease all efforts to reproduce and distribute his game.

According to the lawsuit, Geek Therapeutics announced, earlier this month, plans to distribute and sell the game through its Kickstarter campaign. “Hundreds of people have pre-registered” to provide support for the game, the lawsuit claims, and various websites and merchandise have been created to promote and sell the game.

In addition to an injunction, Thomas’ lawsuit seeks damages for copyright infringement as well as libel and slander, with Thomas alleging the defendants sent its Kickstart backers a supportive email that falsely claimed to be from him.

The defendants have yet to file a response to the lawsuit.


Realms of Kymoria A Therapeutic TTRPG Quickstart Kit for 5e.png
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Egg Embry

Egg Embry

The idea that neurodivergent individuals are predominant in the RPG hobby is a bold statement that requires some citation to back up.
I can't speak to generalities...
But let's see... last 5 groups. In no particular order.
Me: ADHD; Dyslexia; HF Autism or ASD
Group 1 (5p): 2 with Moderate Autism (1 on full disability, the other qualified but works), 2 more with ADHD. Lost one to a move with HF Autism diagnosis, and another with Dyslexia.
Group 2 (7p): 2 with ASD diagosis, 5 of the 6 with some form of dyslexia diagnosis; 3 with ADHD diagnoses. 3 with gender dysphoria (2 in transition)
Group 3 (5p): 1 with autism+ADHD diagnosis, 1 with paranoia diagnosis, 4 of the 5 with Dyslexia, 2 with ADHD diagonsis.
Group 4 (3p, not counting the overlaps from above): 1 PTSD & ADHD, 1 ADHD & chronic depression
Group 5 (3p): 1 ADHD+Dyslexia, 1 undiagnosed depressive with Dyslexia, 1 relatively normal.

so 4 of 5 in group 1 are some flavor of ND
Group 2 is 7 for 7
Group 3 is 5 for 5
group 4 is 2 for 3 of the unique; but it's actually 4 for 5. (Two overlap other groups)
group 5 is 2 for 3.
That is 20 of 23, + me.

From where I've been, either I'm a freaking magnet for neurodivergent gamers, or I've lived in two communities with local excesses of neurdivergents, or neurodivergence is more common in gamers. And I'm not even counting the ones I know are ND but aren't ones I game with.

Going back further doesn't move anywhere near more normal... To get a group that isn't more ND than normal, I have to go back to 1981...

And that's ignoring Alaska's #1 mental illness: Seasonal Affective Disorder.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


So, I backed this out of curiosity. Just got an email the the infringement issue has been cleared up and pledges are back open. Let's see where it goes now.

But did it though?
 

But did it though?

From a quick review, the lawsuit filed by Shawn Thomas against Geek Therapeutics has been shut down. The Kickstarter is allowed to continue.

Now, it's worth noting that the suit was dismissed due to technical reasons (related to jurisdiction) rather than a ruling on the merits of Thomas's claims. The court didn't really say who was right or wrong, just that they weren't the right court to make the decision. So it's possible the suit could be refiled and the process could start over again. But AFAIK, that hasn't happened yet.

So, for the time being, Geek Therapeutics won and Shawn Thomas lost, with the possibility of more legal battles in the future.

Standard disclaimer: IANAL
 

The plot thickens! Eh. My $74 got charged, so I'm in for a penny and a pound, it looks like. More than I'd like to lose if this doesn't happen, but one doesn't pledge without accepting the risk. I'll post thoughts if/when it shows up.

That doesn't mean I don't have concerns about creator rights and the (newly) alleged generative AI. I sincerely hope that the conflicts between GT and ST are resolved equitably.
 
Last edited:

Trending content

Related Articles

Remove ads

Trending content

Remove ads

Top