The cust. serv. Q&A for Tome of Battle stated that meeting pre-reqs only matters when acquiring a maneuver; afterwards you can undercut your "base" of maneuvers used to qualify if you wish by swapping them out with no ill effect. I'm not a fan of that ruling, but WB certainly benefits from the help with the paltry amount of maneuvers known vs. # of disciplines.
Not too much a fan of that either since it goes against how feats work or rather don't work if you lose the prereq feat, but I'll take it since WB is so maneuver deprived.
Yes, stances count as maneuvers for the "must know X # of maneuvers" requirements. Almost all my warblades take Leading the Charge stance to qualify for WR Tactics and/or Battle Leader's Charge w/o having to learn any of those other yucky 1st and 2nd level WR maneuvers (seriously, they're pretty bad). *thumbs up*
That's good, will definitely help when planning out my progression. Thanks for both of those answers!
and if you feel dirty about it, just remind yourself the druid can wildshape and pounce all day long AND still cast 9th level spells. I find it makes me feel far less badly about it.
LOL yep, feel just fine about it now. I actually use it a lot, but multiclass penalties would end up hurting this build so I'd prefer to not dip it this time.
EDIT: Also notice the stone dragon 9th level maneuver, Mountain Tombstone Strike. Requires NO maneuvers known in order to learn.
Wow. Though so-so in its ability compared to say Tiger Claw's where you can outright kill someone, 2d6 Con damage with no save is no laughing matter. Recover and strike again and someone is in serious trouble. Another good strike you've brought to my attention, thanks!