Acid_crash said:Could someone enlighten me as to what these puzzles have to do with the movie and how this all got started?
But, as has been pointed out, JJ said the same thing about the Lost ARG sites last summer, when in fact they were. I think he just wants to make it seem more mysterious and weird.Mouseferatu said:Except that JJ just informed Ain't It Cool News that the Ethan Haas sites are not connected with him or his movie.
Fast Learner said:But, as has been pointed out, JJ said the same thing about the Lost ARG sites last summer, when in fact they were. I think he just wants to make it seem more mysterious and weird.
I'm adamantly fearful. Its going to be hard to make a "past" trek work. J.J. has never showed any scifi chops. Enterprise had all the leftovers from the star trek universe, modernized it up a bit and had the great scott bakula and it still failed.horacethegrey said:See, this is why I'm cautiously optimistic about his involvement in Star Trek. He may perhaps come up with an amazing concepthave an interesting storyline hook, yet his execution may be underwhelming and leave much to be desired.
If Trek is to have a comeback as a franchise, it cannot be underwhelming.