Berandor
lunatic
Dimwhit said:Besides, it's not like the DRM is tough to crack or anything...
Yeah, just wear a pair of gloves when the Austin cop arrives...
What?
Dimwhit said:Besides, it's not like the DRM is tough to crack or anything...
Funksaw said:Actually, Rushlight, the Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998 makes breaking the DRM even on products you own illegal.
That law criminalizes not only the *act* of breaking the DRM or any other encryption designed to enforce copyright, but also criminalizes the ownership of any tools which may do so.
It's a bad law - according to the DMCA, ownership of a sharpie marker (which can be used to circumvent copyright protection on a protected CD) is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
Funksaw said:...but also criminalizes the ownership of any tools which may do so.
Dimwhit said:I guess all of us with Mac OS X is a criminal then, since that's all that's needed to crack this DRM.
Berandor said:What? How? Huh?
Mac-User here, with DRM, without understanding.
Ooohhh! I sooo hope they sue Apple! That'll be fun!Funksaw said:In a nutshell:
The DMCA makes possession of any technology which can bypass copyright protection schemes (like Adobe DRM) illegal and punishable by up to 10 years in jail.
Macintosh OSX has an ability to bypass the copyright protection scheme built into the operating system.
Therefore, ownership of MacOSX is illegal.
Funksaw said:Sadly, it would be accurate. One of the reasons I get so hot under the collar over copyright law is because every man woman and child in the United States has done *something* which can be considered against the law. Instead of having "political crimes" a theoretical tyrannical government could simply selectively enforce the laws on the books to lock up and silence political dissenters.
Brown Jenkin said:I'm not going to punish Monte by not purchacing print products for his Line of Sight article.