Urban Ranger (Approved)

[Trouvere]

Proposed: that the Urban Ranger, and its associated Urban Tracking feat, be made approved content

 

[Rystil Arden]

The Urban Ranger seems a good and balanced option to me. I will wait to hear discussion, but I otherwise intend to vote in favour of this.

 

[orsal]

Looking through the list of differences between the Urban Ranger and the standard Ranger, I think this one gives up no less than it gains, probably a little more (although what it gains is, flavourwise, quite nice). So, I have no balance concerns here. I vote Yes.

 

[Manzanita]

I like the urban ranger as well. I like most of those class variants, in fact. I vote YES.

 

[Rystil Arden]

Well, if two judges can vote yes, without discussion, so can I. YES

 

[Bront]

YES

It's a nice variant.

Is Urban Tracking allready approved? if not, it needs to be, but I'll YES that as well.

 

[B4cchus]

Needless but still nice: another Yes.
I think the urban ranger well balanced (maybe even slightly underppowered compared to a regular one) and more important: a great addition in terms of favour.
For the record, I also vote Yes for the urban tracking feat.

 

[BigB]

How do Ranger/Urban Ranger class levels interact in a multiclass character? Do they stack for caster level or anything else? Spell lists are different so maybe not.

 

[Trouvere]

One is a variant of the other, so I don't believe you can multiclass Ranger/Urban Ranger, just as you can't combine Cleric and Cloistered Cleric.

 

[Bront]

One is a variant of the other, so I don't believe you can multiclass Ranger/Urban Ranger, just as you can't combine Cleric and Cloistered Cleric.

That is correct.