Agamon
Adventurer
I was at first somewhat upset that 3.5 was released to some earlier than most people were able to get it. Now, I'm quite pleased for that fact. I was going to buy the 3.5 books as soon as they were released, but now that we've been able to see what's changed (rather than the conjecture there's been the past few months), I believe the best route for me is to get the SRD and pull the few rules that are good out of that and make them house rules.
I originally tought that a lot of the changes were ignorable if you didn't like them. But I've come to realize that the changes are far larger in scope and much more fundimental to do that easily.
I was happy right off the bat with the idea of 3E. It was a whole new game and I was prepared to embrace it wholesale. I look forward to 4E for the same reasons. But, after seeing what's been done with 3.5, changing the game so much without making a new game, I'm not happy with it.
Anyone else going to say 'screw the books', but still use some of the better changes as house rules?
I originally tought that a lot of the changes were ignorable if you didn't like them. But I've come to realize that the changes are far larger in scope and much more fundimental to do that easily.
I was happy right off the bat with the idea of 3E. It was a whole new game and I was prepared to embrace it wholesale. I look forward to 4E for the same reasons. But, after seeing what's been done with 3.5, changing the game so much without making a new game, I'm not happy with it.
Anyone else going to say 'screw the books', but still use some of the better changes as house rules?