Thurbane
First Post
Indeed. Fluff text often causes unnecessary confusion in these cases.Hypersmurf said:The issue with the energy attacks language, as Shin Okada noted, is that RC states that 'energy' refers to acid, cold, electricity, fire, and sonic, and notes that negative energy and positive energy are not, in fact, energy.
In the case of the Vicious weapon, it doesn't matter for DR purposes, since the damage is dealt by the flash of disruptive energy; it is not damage dealt by a weapon or natural attack, and is thus not subject to DR.
-Hyp.
Even the exact wording of the RC is also slightly less than sterling:
While this is clear on its interaction with DR and such, the wording still implies that positive and negative are in fact "energy", just not one of the "normal" types of energy.RC said:Negative energy and positive energy are damage types, but not considered energy types in the way that acid, cold, electricity, fire or sonic are.
...and then there's force (magic missile etc.), which while not one of the "big five", is still a form of energy.

I agree with all of your RAW judgements here Hyp, I'm just saying that the wording in the rules could be a lot clearer. As for the vicious weapon, no matter which way you read it, DR is not going to help you when wielding one.
Finally, no offense intended Shin, but while the FAQ may not be ironclad, it is still more official than your personal interpretation, or mine for that matter.
