Consecrate counts for vile damage?Erekose13 said:there is! its consecrate, I knew I wasnt going crazy
Yeah, I did too. Then I checked my notes. As I said in the edit above--the trouble is that the entire corrupted area of the jungle counts as a desecrate (which is why these undead are a bit strong for such pansy undead)Erekose13 said:yup just looked it up.
Since the Desecrate is a persistant effect (somewhat similar to someone casting desecrate every round, I guess) that can't be dispelled except at the source, only suppressed, and I wouldn't allow the Desecrate to use that fact to manifest despite the single Consecrate, I'd say that the double Consecrate wouldn't work, but a single Consecrate will keep an area at least safe from the Desecrate (plus untainted when you go further east to the Tainted Lands that are even worse off!). A Consecrate in a non-corrupted area (like the area significantly to the west, or inside that golden sphere in the village even, will work fine thoughErekose13 said:consecrate cast once would dispel desecrate, you'd then have to cast it again to consecrate an area, right?
Nope--not Hallowed. But it is warded, which is half as goodErekose13 said:yeah not that we know any of that. though i had thought the golden sphere was already hallowed and would most likely serve our purposes. of course obscurity is oblivious to things divine and would have no clue about this.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.