That makes three FOR. Consider that the ruling. Thanks all for your input!I agree, Fell Rebuke isn't treated as a spell, nor is it technically an attack.
Which is another way that the new "spell-less spellcaster" approach has more impact than may have been intended....though in Vecna's case, again its all fair play for a CR 26!Using features will not negate Vecna's Invisibility unless it involves Casting A Spell or making an Attack roll.
Morcolt can see him thanks to True Seeing, so is calling out his position anyway. Also, since he is not trying to Stealth to remain hidden, his general "area" is known to the PCs, but obviously he is Unseen to the others.Which is another way that the new "spell-less spellcaster" approach has more impact than may have been intended....though in Vecna's case, again its all fair play for a CR 26!
That said, while Vecna is still invisible, I don't know if he would still be hidden (after all invis is not auto hide in 5e). Throwing around magical effects probably would still give away some notes on your position, enough that an action to stealth might still be required.
Yep, it is a tough call, but given his strategy I think essential for the time being.I see that you've updated the previous turns to indicate that Vecna failed one concentration check and would need to use legendary resistance in order to maintain invisibility. That one's a tough call - on the one hand, Vecna's relatively low AC means it isn't helping him hugely against direct attacks, but on the other hand it does prevent him from being targeted by effects that require one to see the target.
I forgot about level 15: persistent rage (without which, my rage would have ended at the end of my turn). So yeah, I'll Rage.Are you bonus action raging?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.