frankthedm
First Post
Non-tactical combats?! Heresy!short, non-tactical combats
Last edited:
Non-tactical combats?! Heresy!short, non-tactical combats
Probably nothing spectacular? (As in, publish the third rulebook but using the same rule set as in the two first ones. Specifically, not giving it the WFRP overhaul in the foreseeable future)Myself, I'm curios what they'll do with the WH40kRP line.
Black Library, but right you are.I don't think they got the novels. Black industries kept those.
But isn't it normally the publisher who organizes play events (at least at the biggest cons)?Since there wasn't even so much as a single WFRP-TWO event at GenCon, I was pretty pessimistic about the future of this game. There's a lot of bitching and groaning from 1e vs 2e or 2e vs 3e, but not a lot of courage at making it to game conventions to expand our beloved hobby. I applaud any of you who step up to run WFRP (any version) at conventions and game days.
But isn't it normally the publisher who organizes play events (at least at the biggest cons)?
But isn't it normally the publisher who organizes play events (at least at the biggest cons)? The fact FFG sat on a new edition totally explains why they didn't set up any WFRP2 events, without the lack of any such events suggesting anything like a pessimistic future. Unless, of course, you are specifically thinking of the second edition, and not the overall Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay game line.
I sure am diggin' the character card that guy is holding in the 2nd and 4th photos.![]()