Joshua Randall
Legend
While gearing up a paladin character and his special mount, I noticed something: warhorses are (apparently) not proficient with any armor!
Not being proficient with armor has some pretty hefty penalties:
But maybe I've overlooked some obscure rule somewhere that gives war-trained mounts proficiency with armor?
The warhose in the SRD's monster section doesn't have any armor in either its AC line nor in its description.SRD said:A creature’s armor proficiencies (if it has any) depend on its type, but in general a creature is automatically proficient with any kind of armor it is described as wearing (light, medium, or heavy), and with all lighter kinds of armor.
Not being proficient with armor has some pretty hefty penalties:
The attack roll penalty is ouchy, especially if your warhorse is wearing full plate (-6! armor check penalty).SRD said:Nonproficient with Armor Worn: A character who wears armor and/or uses a shield with which he or she is not proficient takes the armor’s (and/or shield’s) armor check penalty on attack rolls and on all Strength-based and Dexterity-based ability and skill checks. The penalty for nonproficiency with armor stacks with the penalty for nonproficiency with shields.
But maybe I've overlooked some obscure rule somewhere that gives war-trained mounts proficiency with armor?