I don't get that impression at all. Look at the credits pages in your books.In many ways, 3E was Monte's game
I don't get that impression at all. Look at the credits pages in your books.In many ways, 3E was Monte's game
rounser said:I don't get that impression at all. Look at the credits pages in your books.
Mike_Lescault said:A couple of days before GenCon, I was able to interview Monte on my podcast. We talked about a lot of things, including his career. Even though he was visiting WotC at the time and had been in many meetings the day before, getting the scoop on 4E, it was my pre-con podcast, so we weren't able to talk about 4E.
However, if you're interested in hearing his thoughts in his own words, you can check it out here. http://webcast2.wizards.com/podcasts/07gencon/grz_009.mp3
Lord Zardoz said:As an aside, the amount of wild speculation and rumor flying around, as well as the conspiracy theories, are highly entertaining, if wildly inaccurate. Not that I am in any position to be better informed than anyone else, mind you.
END COMMUNICATION
I got the impression that 3E was a huge group effort, with at least three main developers, a lot of input from Peter Adkison, playtesters etc. etc. But I could be wrong.I do, and after looking again, still do. YMMV
rounser said:It's a curiosity to me that the position of "author of the DMG" has made Monte Cook the new Gygax in a lot of people's eyes. A cult of personality seemed to develop around him which sort of explains the kind of comment you've made there, and probably had a huge contribution to the success of Malhavoc Press. Do you have inside information that suggests 3E was mostly his doing?
I was thinking just that as I read the OP. I was even going to use the words 'magnum opus'.Doug McCrae said:Wouldn't immediately after completing one's magnum opus be the perfect time?