die_kluge said:The NPC in question is nearly a god, and is pretty much invincible.
It certainly did not originate with Fritz Lieber and his Lankhmar stories..
Tonguez said:
Its sad isn't it (and probably says something about modern culture) that ancient mythologies are forgotten and the 'quotes' of modern fiction becomes regarded as the source of our ideas - quite ironic really
kenjib said:
Naw, more just like a simple mistake in this case. The postmodern theory around this phenomenon goes under the moniker "simulacra." Or it can just be viewed as a simple corruption of information. From these angles, it is usually seen negatively. However, viewing it as another form of evolution actually provides a positive aspect of the same phenomenon. Old symbols are semiotically reinvented in the modern context and thus gain an entire new life, often drawing from and reinforcing the old symbol. I wouldn't think of it so simply as to say that it's always a sad thing -- anymore than I would agree with people who bemoan the ever changing vernacular in language while holding up the Oxford English dictionary as a linguistic bible to diverge from which is tantamount to sin.
But anyway, mistake it was indeed and thanks for the correction! I did know that somewhere in the back of my mind, but things don't always come to the front as readily as I would like...
EDIT: One could even argue that the vast majority of fantasy tropes are exactly such reinventions, and we do love them no?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.