We're All Gamers Together: Why Harassment Has To Stop

Status
Not open for further replies.

Another piece talking about the harassment of women in tabletop gaming has surfaced on the internet. At least one of the incidents related in that piece has been substantiated as being true, so I am willing to accept that there is more truth in that article. Whether gamers, or geeks in general, want to admit it or not, there are serious issues within our communities with how people act towards women, people of color, and the LGBTQI. We need to knock that off right now. Obviously, this is an opinion piece.
Just as a warning, for those who might be bothered by certain sorts of content, some of the incidents that were relayed to me, the stories that were told, have jarring, uncomfortable occurrences in them. If mentions of rape and unsolicitated physical contact will bother you, you might want to skip the rest of this article. I know reading the emails and PMs from these women bothered me as they came in.

As much as what these women related bothered me, and obviously bothered them as the targets of the harassment, I felt that the fact that it was so uncomfortable was exactly the reason why this current piece needed to be written. We, as a group, need to start looking the people doing this harassment in the eye and telling them that we don’t think it is okay. We need to stop pushing these accounts into the shadows, under the rugs, and pretending that they do not exist. We need to make our communities into better places for everyone, and not just a bunch of men.

I put out a call over my various social media feeds (which was shared a lot), asking for women to share their experiences of harassment in tabletop gaming with me. Anonymity was offered to those who wanted it, and not surprisingly most respondents asked that their names be kept confidential. The reasons for them wanting to be kept anonymous were one of two. First, they were afraid of further harassment within their communities for calling out the bad behavior. They seen how women who tell men to stop get treated in small, closed communities and, for better or worse, they want to continue with their hobbies without additional harassment. The second reason was a bit scarier. Some of these women are professionals, working in tabletop gaming in a number of different capacities, who fear that publicly coming forward would negatively impact their careers within gaming.

I’ll just say that last one again, with emphasis: they were afraid that coming forward about their harassment, or the harassment that they had witnessed, would negatively impact their careers in tabletop gaming.

Because of these reasons, I will be keeping the identities of everyone who asked anonymous. Everyone who spoke with me identified themselves, I am just not identifying them.

One of the common threads through the experiences shared was rape. Most of these women had had characters raped during convention play, online games, or at events at stores. Sometimes the rapes were matter-of-factly introduced into play, others there was a titillating level of graphic detail to the assaults. One women talked about how a regular attendee at a local convention bragged of having a “rape kit” in his car for the women at the convention, and at one point he yelled at her to “find him women to sleep with.” She also talked about the organizers of the convention having a “men only camping retreat” and when she was on the board of the con the only way that she could attend was “nude and wearing a dog collar.” Another woman talked about the GM of her online game suddenly having her character knocked unconscious, taken away on a ship, and then graphically narrated raping her character. All of this occurred on voice chat while using a popular virtual tabletop site.

Another woman told me that her attempts at organizing a couple of women only games for a VTT online convention was met with such vehemence from male gamers that the games were pulled from the schedule of the convention.

People wonder why more and more people think that anti-harassment policies are needed at conventions. After all, even Gen Con has one:
Gen Con: The Best Four Days in Gaming! is dedicated to providing a harassment-free Event experience for everyone, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, religion, or affiliation. We do not tolerate harassment of convention participants in any form. Convention participants violating these rules may be sanctioned or expelled without refund at the discretion of show management.

And an Ethics policy:

All of the following constitute grounds for expulsion from the convention without refund:
  • Violating any federal, state, or local laws, facility rules or convention policies
  • Failure to comply with the instructions of Gen Con Event Staff or security personnel
  • Using anything in a threatening or destructive manner against person or property
  • Endangering the safety of oneself or others
  • Threatening, stealing, cheating or harassing others
  • Failure to conduct oneself in a mature manner

The creators of the 13th Age RPG have anti-harassment policies for their organized play because “Nobody shows up for a game with the goal of feeling uncomfortable or unsafe, and sorry that they came. But organized play brings together many different types of people with different expectations and approaches to play. An anti-harassment policy sets ground rules that everyone can recognize and follow, resulting in better games and more fun.” In the policy they outline harassment as “Everyone has the right to a space that is safe from any type of harassment: physical, verbal, emotional, or sexual.”

Honestly, considering the experiences that have been related to me, these sorts of policies should be commonplace for conventions and organized play. I have heard that Paizo is currently drafting an anti-harassment policy for their organized play, and Ad Astra Games has one in place already.

These are some of the more overt things that women have to deal with in their tabletop gaming experiences, and doesn’t go into the more “casual” or systemic harassment and sexism that women deal with at conventions, in online play and at game stores. One of the women talked about women being a subclass in society, and it being more so in gaming communities. “It sucks for a female gamer, going into a store and having that reaction.”

Men are openly commenting on women’s body parts in a sexual manner. Sexual content is added to games because “that’s the kind of stuff that women like.” Crude sexual references and jokes are made.

I’m not saying that there is no place for sexual, or adult themes, in gaming. Just the opposite, in fact. In my personal groups I game with grownups, and we play games that can have adult material in them. We have, however, agreed that content like that is okay in advance, and most of the time we agree that players’ agency over their characters should not be railroaded by the story of the game, or the actions of the GM. There is a huge difference between making awkward sexual comments out of the blue, because you are hoping it will interest a woman gamer, and making awkward sexual comments that people expect in their game. This goes doubly so for games in public spaces, like conventions or stores.

And just because it is okay with your wife, girlfriend or the woman in your gaming group at home, that doesn’t mean that it is okay with all women. If it makes someone at the table uncomfortable, or makes them feel like they are being harassed, just don’t do it, or apologize for having done it.

And, of course, none of them are safe from accusations of being a “fake geek girl,” or being in the store to get something for their husband or boyfriend. Apparently the idea that a woman would want to buy her own dice or miniatures or rule books is alien to some gamers.

As Jon Peterson, author of Playing at the World, points out in an online essay, there have always been gender problems in tabletop gaming. But he also points out that women have been interested in tabletop gaming for a long time. But, just because something has “always been that way,” it does not mean that it has to stay that way. Even in the 1970s TSR Games employees were taken to task by fandom, and female designers, to be more respectful of women gamers and to stop using phrases like “ladygamers.” Sadly, these attitudes that were considered to be outdated back then are still being perpetuated now…in some cases by some of the same people.

My first AD&D group, back in 1979, had a woman for the GM, and about half of the group were women. Most of my groups since then have had women involved in them. We need to be better, as a community, about these things. We need to speak out when we see women being harassed, online or in person, and we need to tell the people who think that doing this is okay that it isn’t. We need to be active in making the change that creates better communities where we don’t have to worry about our friends being harassed because of their gender, or their sexual preferences, or their ethnicity. We have to convince conventions and organized play societies that having anti-harassment policies is a good thing, and enforcing them so that everyone feels welcomed and accepted is a better thing.

Guys, we have to remember that this isn’t about us. This isn’t about our perceptions of what is happening at conventions, during organized play events and in online games. We sit back, listen and ask what we need to do, rather than try to make the discussion about how it “isn’t all men.” We already know that. We need to not take the focus away from what needs to be done.

There are never going to be completely safe spaces, in gaming or outside of it. However, we can make better places where no one has to worry about their body parts being part of the table talk, or their characters being sexually violated. It is the 21st century, and we should be better about this than we are. We need to stop being quiet, stop facilitating harassment, and we need to start making better spaces for ourselves and our fellow gamers. A group, like nerds, that talk so much about being harassed in their youth for being different should really be more sensitive about harassing others. We can, as a group, be better about this, and we need to do it.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I'm sure there is, but I'm asking you here.

Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk

Well, you've been polite, so I'll outline the problem as best I can. First, by "adopt alternative lifestyles," I meant in a fantasy game world society, not in reality, as that would be an absurd position (akin to saying that video games cause violent behavior, which isn't the case). No, I'm not saying the rules are going to "turn anybody [insert] here." Again, absurd.

This adoption snowballs into my own preferences, my game world, and my own acting ability at the table. For example, I'm incapable of role-playing a transgender person. Worse, I might buy an adventure and discover that the mayor of town X has been scripted as Y lifestyle so now I'm forced to play a lifestyle not only alien to me, but unsettling to me on a personal level... and if I "do it wrong" I cause offense. I've played for 35 years and sex is a topic generally and traditionally left on the sidelines which is where it belongs. Were I a professional Hollywood actor, I'd get to choose whether to "take the part." I likewise get to abstain from purchasing a game system which attempts to wheedle that into "my world."

It's up to you and your group to add those features if that's what you want, not a game system.

Are you able to name literally one major modern game system that insists that you personally adopt an "alternative lifestyle" to play?

I'd wager not.

See above.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Please stop just stop with this nonsense I am well aware of many in social justice who push this but that is not what anti harassment polices at cons are about.

I've seen this sort of mentality spread through 3 or 4 of my other hobbies already so you'll have to forgive me if I seem concerned about that.

I don't know any con committee or the people who run this who feel this way.

Many universities here in America have implemented similar "micro-aggression" policies. If you'd like I can link you to some videos/articles.

I find people like you just as extreme you are all so busy trying to defend your positions that you make up these extreme examples of what might happen if we try and stop harassment.

In the spirit of assumptions being put to text, I find people like you to just be naive and ignorant of what's actually going on.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...got-two-people-fired-and-led-to-ddos-attacks/

Someone was fired because the person behind them overheard a "dongle" joke that was made to a friend.

http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/22839/

Many universities are now starting to police language used by professors and student workers/government bodies. Some of these offensive phrases include...

"America is a melting pot."

"I don't see skin color, I just see people."

"I believe the most qualified person should get the job."

Items like I mentioned earlier, like "nuts", "insane" or "crazy" are often included as they marginalize individuals with mental health issues.

Sigh are you so clueless about how privilege works that you don't understand the issue with this. The majority of gamers are men so there will always be able to find a table with just men.

You're so wrapped up in the fact that I'm not agreeing with you 100% that you aren't actually reading what I'm typing. No, I don't deny that. That's not the issue. Please re-read what I said a few more times. My issue was with someone who claimed that the men who want all men table top campaigns are part of the harassment problem. This becomes even more hypocritical when you consider that they posted this comment in a thread created with an article which complained that women wanting to do the same thing was met with harassment.
 

This adoption snowballs into my own preferences, my game world, and my own acting ability at the table. For example, I'm incapable of role-playing a transgender person. Worse, I might buy an adventure and discover that the mayor of town X has been scripted as Y lifestyle so now I'm forced to play a lifestyle not only alien to me, but unsettling to me on a personal level...

You find transgender people and people with non-hetero sexualities "unsettling on a personal level" and are literally incapable of pretending to be one such person?

But roleplaying actual murderous villains is something you feel perfectly at home doing?

And presumably you've roleplayed women NPCs in the past just fine, despite them being (ostensibly) attracted to men.

You'll forgive us if we have trouble taking this sort of claim seriously.

and if I "do it wrong" I cause offense.

Really? You've made an honest effort to roleplay someone with an "alternative lifestyle" in a respectful manner, and people have taken you to task for "doing it wrong"? If that's honestly happened to you, I'm sorry you had to experience that.

I've played for 35 years and sex is a topic generally and traditionally left on the sidelines which is where it belongs.

Sex? Sure. Sexuality and gender? Not so much. Or should we bring to your attention the countless times heterosexuality is highlighted or mentioned in your typical published campaign?
 

Well, you've been polite, so I'll outline the problem as best I can. First, by "adopt alternative lifestyles," I meant in a fantasy game world society, not in reality, as that would be an absurd position (akin to saying that video games cause violent behavior, which isn't the case). No, I'm not saying the rules are going to "turn anybody [insert] here." Again, absurd.

This adoption snowballs into my own preferences, my game world, and my own acting ability at the table. For example, I'm incapable of role-playing a transgender person. Worse, I might buy an adventure and discover that the mayor of town X has been scripted as Y lifestyle so now I'm forced to play a lifestyle not only alien to me, but unsettling to me on a personal level... and if I "do it wrong" I cause offense. I've played for 35 years and sex is a topic generally and traditionally left on the sidelines which is where it belongs. Were I a professional Hollywood actor, I'd get to choose whether to "take the part." I likewise get to abstain from purchasing a game system which attempts to wheedle that into "my world."

It's up to you and your group to add those features if that's what you want, not a game system.

I just want to clarify something:

If a DM "buy an adventure and discover that the mayor of town X has been scripted as Y lifestyle" that DM doesn't have to play that lifestyle. DMs constantly change published adventures to suit their tastes and their homebrewed settings.

If an NPC is written as straight, you can play them as not straight (and vice versa). If an NPC is described as white, you can make them a person of color (and vice versa). No one is going to bust down your door and demand that you play it the way it was written.
 

You find transgender people and people with non-hetero sexualities "unsettling on a personal level" and are literally incapable of pretending to be one such person?

But roleplaying actual murderous villains is something you feel perfectly at home doing?

You'll forgive us if we have trouble taking this sort of claim seriously.



Really? You've made an honest effort to roleplay someone with an "alternative lifestyle" in a respectful manner, and people have taken you to task for "doing it wrong"? If that's honestly happened to you, I'm sorry you had to experience that.



Sex? Sure. Sexuality and gender? Not so much. Or should we bring to your attention the countless times heterosexuality is highlighted or mentioned in your typical published campaign?

I'm entitled to my preferences.
 

This article from Newsweek noting the predominance of white, right-wing terrorists in the USA cites- among others, the SPLC and Arie Perliger, the director of terrorism studies at the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point.

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/02/12/...ger-threat-america-isis-jihadists-422743.html

Here's one from Time:
http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/

The NY Times talks about the results of a survey of several hundred law enforcement agencies done with the Police Executive Research Foundation. Right wing extremism was the #1 concern. Besides more supporting numbers garnished from Perliger's work, the article also states:


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/opinion/the-other-terror-threat.html?_r=0

As for Europe? Well, Loonwatch used Europol's data- the resulting aggregate over several years of terror research was this:
http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/01/terrorism-in-europe/

As I look through this, what do you have to say about your original link to the FBI report who included "tree spiking" and "attempted vandalism" with regards to terrorism? Regardless of whether or not you think that those things are actually terrorism, hopefully you can see the difference between that and violent attacks like mass shootings and bombings.

While I haven't looked at the gender demographics at all, I wouldn't be surprised to find women were more likely to be child abusers than men. They still do the majority of child care, as both family members and professionals in child day care & babysitting. That translates into a huge statistical slant in opportunity.

I haven't read all your posts here, but did you ever make such a distinction with white male population percentages and how that might skew harassment reports in the table top community? If not, why haven't you yet? I have no issue with that defense, but lets apply it across the board.
 

I just want to clarify something:

If a DM "buy an adventure and discover that the mayor of town X has been scripted as Y lifestyle" that DM doesn't have to play that lifestyle. DMs constantly change published adventures to suit their tastes and their homebrewed settings.


Defeats the purpose of purchasing prepared material.
 

I am really tired of the excuse that harassers don't know better and are socially awkward. I used to be shy and socially awkward but I knew touching someone without their permission was wrong I knew calling out nasty things to them was wrong and I knew that when someone asked me to stop bothering them that I should.
Social awkward or being a nerd/geek should never ever be an excuse for those actions!

But please understand that some of us have never observed that behavior in our gaming communities, game stores, or even local cons. I hope most of us are not these kinds of people, so it might be some quite alien concepts for a lot of gamers. Rationally I can recognize that nerdy gamers aren't some kind of exception to society, there are rapists, killers, and criminals among us. It just doesn't jive with the save place we view gaming and our personal experiences. Some people won't react to this rationally though and throw up denials and excuses.

I'm curious if this problem is prevalent in North America or is it also as prevalent (or better/worse) in Europe?
 

If an NPC is written as straight, you can play them as not straight (and vice versa). If an NPC is described as white, you can make them a person of color (and vice versa). No one is going to bust down your door and demand that you play it the way it was written.

I was asked to elaborate. I did that. No desire to refute the obvious.
 

I'm entitled to my preferences.

You absolutely are! But it leaves the rest of us wondering if your preferences (which I'm sure none of us saw coming) are perhaps the actual driving force behind your staunch opposition to the notion that claims from women and minorities of harassment in the gaming community should be taken more seriously.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top