D&D 5E (2024) What’s the difference between sorcerers, warlocks, and wizards?


log in or register to remove this ad




ETA: With a little more thought this should be a separate thread. Moving it over here.

 


Aren't Bards supposed to be the natural smooth talker of the party with the Charisma buff spells?
Are you talking about sorcerers with deception, persuasion, and intimidate class skills, high SAD Charisma, and spells like charm person or enhance abilities?

Or warlocks with high SAD Charisma, charm person and suggestion spells, and deception and intimidate class skills?

:)

Anybody can pick up social skills with a background, and social buff spells like enhance ability are pretty common, most anybody can be a decent (and quite a few can be very very good) party face who does mechanical social interaction. Even getting a wingman to interact and give you advantage is pretty easy and encourages more than one PC to interact socially even if they are not designed mechanically for it instead of sitting that part of the game out.

It is something I really like about 5e.
 

One class would have a wide array of divination magic (wizard)
One class would have a wide assortment of language magic and naturally speak their patron's tongue (warlock)
One class would have Charisma boosting and appearance magic (sorcerer).

A wizard wouldn't have the spells to smooth talk Lord Gray not the natural talent. But he would have the spells to contact an outsider who can inform them of information about the lord's domain.

Information he could do pass onto the sorcerer who is a natural smooth talker and has Charisma buff spells.
Can the wizard have a good charisma and proficiency in social skills, or is that too much bleed over?
 



Remove ads

Top