What are the rules for?

[mmadsen]

Oh yeah @Snarf Zagyg wrote a lot about FKR.

I’ve mentioned it quite a few times myself, but not as recently.

 

[mmadsen]

To me tabletop roleplaying is a mash-up of two very different hobbies:

• A hacked tabletop wargame where you get to try anything and subvert the rules
• A form of improv storytelling where you have better continuity and minor characters

The point of the rules for the hacked tabletop wargame is to be the wargame rules you are subverting and to provide something to push against to create the world.

Can you explain what you mean by subverting the rules here? I assume you simply mean that players can try anything, including all the unconventional tactics outside the purview of a narrowly defined wargame.

 

[Neonchameleon]

Can you explain what you mean by subverting the rules here? I assume you simply mean that players can try anything, including all the unconventional tactics outside the purview of a narrowly defined wargame.

Pretty much, yes.

 

[MGibster]

A little over 30 years ago, a friend and I played one of those old time hex & chit war games of the Battle of Stalingrad. (It was not Avalon Hill's Stalingrad.) German victory was achieved by taking the city and Soviet victory was denying the Germans their prize. At the beginning of the game, the Germans were in a stronger position with better units, more units, and more reinforcements coming. The Soviet units were weaker, fewer, and it would take a few turns before reinforcement in numbers would start to arrive.

Standard Soviet strategy was to go defensive, trying to slow the German advance until old man winter and reinforcements would arrive. As the Soviet player, I decided to go on the offensive on my very first turn. This was a surprise to my opponent because every time my unit engaged a German unit the odds were in their favor. I was extremely fortunate with my dice rolls, destorying most of the German units I attacked and seeing their offense collapse because I punched a big hole in its center. Life was about to get difficult for the Germans, so my friend decided maybe we should play a different game.

If there was an arbiter intead of rules, I would have lost the game right then and there. Conventional wisdom would have said my poorly trained, equipped, and led units were inferior to the Germans. And while that isn't incorrect, sometimes in war, as in all aspects of life, the unexpected happen. You can do everything wrong and still end up winning. You can do everything right and still lose. Rules provide you the opportunity to react to the unexpected in a way an arbiter does not.

 

[Koloth]

A little over 30 years ago, a friend and I played one of those old time hex & chit war games of the Battle of Stalingrad. (It was not Avalon Hill's Stalingrad.) German victory was achieved by taking the city and Soviet victory was denying the Germans their prize. At the beginning of the game, the Germans were in a stronger position with better units, more units, and more reinforcements coming. The Soviet units were weaker, fewer, and it would take a few turns before reinforcement in numbers would start to arrive.

Standard Soviet strategy was to go defensive, trying to slow the German advance until old man winter and reinforcements would arrive. As the Soviet player, I decided to go on the offensive on my very first turn. This was a surprise to my opponent because every time my unit engaged a German unit the odds were in their favor. I was extremely fortunate with my dice rolls, destorying most of the German units I attacked and seeing their offense collapse because I punched a big hole in its center. Life was about to get difficult for the Germans, so my friend decided maybe we should play a different game.

If there was an arbiter intead of rules, I would have lost the game right then and there. Conventional wisdom would have said my poorly trained, equipped, and led units were inferior to the Germans. And while that isn't incorrect, sometimes in war, as in all aspects of life, the unexpected happen. You can do everything wrong and still end up winning. You can do everything right and still lose. Rules provide you the opportunity to react to the unexpected in a way an arbiter does not.

A similar situation was the Battle of Midway. Japan had more ships, better ships, better planes, experienced pilots, torpedoes that worked, and cooperative weather. The US had better intelligence and had managed to save the Yorktown at the Coral Sea and get her hastily repaired for Midway(Japan thought her sunk). Hard to imagine that a group of arbiters would have ruled in such a way to allow the US to win. Not sure how you would get from the early Japanese win over Midway proper to the later carrier planes vs carrier planes fight where the US managed to pull off a bizarre victory despite almost no communication between the various air groups.

 

[Thomas Shey]

My own feeling is it is a combination of a resolution system, and a communication tool to allow the players to understand what that resoultion process will be like, at least in common cases.