What are you reading in 2025?

Yeah I think a lot of this comes from authors coming at the issue of worldbuilding "backwards" as it were
Yes, I think you nailed it with the reasoning here. It feels like she had the plot before the world and than just designed it to fit. The funny thing is - the characters are not even all like that simple, it just get repeated very often. Sentences similar to "typical to a raven, she did this" or "he is a fox, of course he would do X" . If she would've just reduced these sentences a lot, I think I would've noticed it much less.

'd say it's pretty notable how different and more diverse and organic and complex the societies of people who use "forwards" worldbuilding (like NK Jemisin, when I think of "proper" worldbuilding in a modern fantasy novel, I think of The Broken Earth trilogy)
This comment just pushed Broken Earth Trilogy farther on top of my TBR!
 

log in or register to remove this ad

This is a symptom of the same "backwards" approach to worldbuilding - i.e. the author just thinks "What do rich people do for fun?", doesn't even really think historically beyond like, the 1920s very often (let alone do historical research to get any ideas - I mean you don't have to then follow those ideas, but it's good to know), and then puts it pretty much straight into their setting and works around that, rather than the actual worldbuilding approach where you think about the society you've created, and what resources and traditions the nobles have, and what they might be doing because of that (what social benefits and so on).

I'd say it's pretty notable how different and more diverse and organic and complex the societies of people who use "forwards" worldbuilding (like NK Jemisin, when I think of "proper" worldbuilding in a modern fantasy novel, I think of The Broken Earth trilogy) are to authors using more "backwards" worldbuilding (though being everyone does a bit of both) but I think there's a real question as to whether most audiences care about this or even notice the issues.
I think there’s also a solid element of “didn’t do the research, or at least no research around anything I wasn’t interested in” with a side order of “nobody else I’ve read has done the research either”. Some writers seem to think that because they’re writing fantasy they don’t have to do historical research, which is unfortunately quite incorrect a lot of the time.

It’s worse if you’re writing some form of historical fiction, of course. There was a whole thread about this on Bluesky the other day, starting with Joanne Harris noting a recent book she’d read where a Victorian detective gives someone a 50p coin as a tip. I’m sure we can all think of many examples.
 

with a side order of “nobody else I’ve read has done the research either”
That's a good point. I think that's a big part of why it's becoming increasingly common again (decades ago it was very common too), especially with self-publishing and fanfic and so on. Like, obviously, if you're writing a fanfic, you don't need to do research, but maybe if you're getting published and people are paying you money it behoves you to do some?

But yeah, if they don't even read books where that's happened, it's not surprising. Especially with how insular some communities are (esp. YA).

This comment just pushed Broken Earth Trilogy farther on top of my TBR!
It's quite a tough series of novels, but it is worth it imo, they were basically classics by the time they were finished, with strong timelessness and self-complete-ness (very uncommon in fantasy). And I wouldn't say that about all of Jemisin's work - like The City We Became has some fantastic ideas (especially the post-Lovecraftian elements and urban alienation via blandness/gentrification/brandification, and how that relates to the post-Lovecraftian stuff) but I found it to be a little cold and up itself (like the actual "chip on its shoulder" re: any major city that isn't NYC, which is weird as hell in a book about working together to resist stuff - why go out of your way to piss on others facing the same challenges whilst doing that?), and I couldn't tell you anything about any of the characters. It's very clever but not a classic in the same way.
 

It's very clever but not a classic in the same way.
That is good to hear that Broken Earth is better because I already loved the city we became! Thought it was indeed a clever concept and fun read. My main gripe was when I remember correctly that the lovecraftian aspect didn't really work for me somehow although I loved the whole lovecraftian monster als metaphor/manifestation of gentrification. I've never read the second book though, did you?
 

That is good to hear that Broken Earth is better because I already loved the city we became! Thought it was indeed a clever concept and fun read. My main gripe was when I remember correctly that the lovecraftian aspect didn't really work for me somehow although I loved the whole lovecraftian monster als metaphor/manifestation of gentrification. I've never read the second book though, did you?
I heard that it pretty much "got pandemic'd" in that Jemisin by her own admission totally lost enthusiasm (not because she didn't believe in the story, but pandemic blues, totally understandable), but felt she had to finish it, and combined the manuscripts from the two next books in the "We Became" trilogy into one, which has some good moments and finishes the story, but was ultimately disappointing, especially for people who loved the previous one. Anyway I didn't read it as a result.

Keen to see what she does next of course!
 

which has some good moments and finishes the story, but was ultimately disappointing, especially for people who loved the previous one. Anyway I didn't read it as a result.
Its fascinating how widespread the damages done by the pandemic are. Every few weeks I learn about another consequence of the pandemic, even years later. Anway, thats interesting to read, I guess I will skip on that one too. But very looking forward to Broken Earth and her upcoming work.
 

Its fascinating how widespread the damages done by the pandemic are. Every few weeks I learn about another consequence of the pandemic, even years later. Anway, thats interesting to read, I guess I will skip on that one too. But very looking forward to Broken Earth and her upcoming work.
I personally thought The World We Make was a satisfactory Book Two, and that it resolved the few pending things from The City We Became more than well enough to be worth reading. Of course, I read both books over the course of a weekend, so there's that.
 


I finished Kadrey's Metrophage. Dug it, and how the grime and grit of the world practically oozed off the page. Wasn't expecting the Zen themes in it, but they helped elevate the book.

Now I'm finally getting to Melissa Scott's Trouble and Her Friends.
 

Glad you liked Mwtrophage! I loved the pervasive Surrealist streak, and the Moon stuff in the background, among other things. I need to reread the Trouble stories
 

Remove ads

Top