What are you reading in 2026?

Did a re-read of C.S. Lewis' The Silver Chair. I feel like Narnia gets weirder in this book, and it works for me a whole lot. Also notable is a proto-Underdark setting
Weird and dark is probably why this one is less well known, although the BBC did do an adaptation a long time ago with Tom Baker as Puddleglum. But I agree, this is suspiciously like D&D Underdark for a book series that was omitted from Appendix N. There is a lot of D&Dish plane hopping in Magician’s Nephew too.

There is a take on (deep) gnomes here as well.

I think there was a bit of a Gawain and the Green Knight influence on this novel.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


I'm done with the Antimemetics Division. It's slow burning, but once it gets rolling it makes for an enjoyable read.

I've also read Scorpio and Corvus, the first two books in the new military Sci-Fi Frontline series by Marko Kloos. At tract it feels like a soft reboot of the series, with a new protagonist being introduced and going through a similar path as Greyson in the first series, but nonetheless I liked it. It's definitely literary comfort food, but sometimes that's all you need.
 

I've been reading some Conan comics, the dark horse volumes as well as going back and reading some of the old marvel savage tales comics. It was interesting to read some of the letters or editorials in those magazines as I've known for sometime that Red Sonja was a creation for marvel comics not a REH original, but now I know that there was in fact a Red Sonya written by REH but she was one of his historical fiction (?) creations and she formed the basis for the Hyborian age swordswoman.

In conjunction with this, I'm also reading some of the original stories. It's interesting to see the differences between the two separate comics and the original stories, even the difference in the look of the dragon in Red Nails and how it was interpreted.
The Shadow of the Vulture is a solid story. I could see it making for a good film adaptation.

Weird and dark is probably why this one is less well known, although the BBC did do an adaptation a long time ago with Tom Baker as Puddleglum. But I agree, this is suspiciously like D&D Underdark for a book series that was omitted from Appendix N. There is a lot of D&Dish plane hopping in Magician’s Nephew too.

There is a take on (deep) gnomes here as well.

I think there was a bit of a Gawain and the Green Knight influence on this novel.
I've seen the first two of the BBC adaptations, but not the Silver Chair. Tom Baker playing Puddleglum sounds awesome.

There's a whole lot to unpack in the novel, and I think it likely that bits of it found their way into D&D.
 

Did a re-read of C.S. Lewis' The Silver Chair. I feel like Narnia gets weirder in this book, and it works for me a whole lot. Also notable is a proto-Underdark setting.
It feels to me that the proto-Underdark is as much about depression and despair as it is about an extensive subterranean ecosystem. A lot of The Silver Chair is allegorical in a Pilgrim’s Progress lite sort of way - the Gentle Giants are, well, giants (and sort of referencing Gulliver’s morally superior Brobdinagians) but they’re also representing oblivious middle-class adults who caution children that religion and fairy-tales are nonsense.

Underland is therefore a setup for the Lady’s atheist pitch to our heroes, that all Narnia and Aslan and all good things are an illusion, and for Puddleglum’s debate with her (his argument boils down to a desperate ontological one of “well, I want to believe in it whether it’s real or not”). It’s commonly said that this scene reflects Lewis’ own public debate in 1948 with the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe, which he’s generally said to have lost and which may have put him off writing any more Christian apologetics. Both Lewis and Anscombe underplayed the importance of their debate. In any case, the themes here foreshadow (ha ha) Lewis’ ultimate pitch in The Last Battle that it is real life that is the illusion (“shadowlands”) and God who is truly real.
 

I gave Predator Kills the Marvel Universe a shot, mostly because the Alien vs Avengers from a few years ago was surprisingly good and made me reconsider this sort of crossover. That one was just an outlier though, as PKtMU is...stupid. Very, very, very dumb. As of issue 2, almost every kill the Yuatja (who are lead by Kraven for some reason, which is how I learned this is a sequel series) make requires the Marvel characters to be written incredibly badly. The X-Men, for example, get killed very quickly because they assume the Yuatja are just the danger room shorting out because of a storm and Magneto is killed....by a big magnet.
My neighbor lent me a box full of crossover Batman and alt universe what if type Batman comics from the 90s and it includes some Batman Versus Predator and Batman Versus Alien which I read last year. The BvP includes a lot of the Predator figuring out human social structures and going after crime bosses as the top predators who are feared (and Batman as their predator who induces fear in them) which seemed a bit of a stretch as opposed to going after the more immediately dangerous armed criminals or cops in the urban setting.

I found a lot of the crossover stuff to vary wildly in quality of writing, some obviously to just capitalize on popular stuff, some exploring interesting stuff and well done.
 
Last edited:

It feels to me that the proto-Underdark is as much about depression and despair as it is about an extensive subterranean ecosystem. A lot of The Silver Chair is allegorical in a Pilgrim’s Progress lite sort of way - the Gentle Giants are, well, giants (and sort of referencing Gulliver’s morally superior Brobdinagians) but they’re also representing oblivious middle-class adults who caution children that religion and fairy-tales are nonsense.

Underland is therefore a setup for the Lady’s atheist pitch to our heroes, that all Narnia and Aslan and all good things are an illusion, and for Puddleglum’s debate with her (his argument boils down to a desperate ontological one of “well, I want to believe in it whether it’s real or not”). It’s commonly said that this scene reflects Lewis’ own public debate in 1948 with the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe, which he’s generally said to have lost and which may have put him off writing any more Christian apologetics. Both Lewis and Anscombe underplayed the importance of their debate. In any case, the themes here foreshadow (ha ha) Lewis’ ultimate pitch in The Last Battle that it is real life that is the illusion (“shadowlands”) and God who is truly real.
There's a lot going on with The Silver Chair, to be sure. The irony of Puddleglum, the most pessimistic character, articulating against the Green Lady at the end is not lost on me. Nor is the irony of how much pagan symbolism and imagery is present in the Chronicles.
 

There's a lot going on with The Silver Chair, to be sure. The irony of Puddleglum, the most pessimistic character, articulating against the Green Lady at the end is not lost on me. Nor is the irony of how much pagan symbolism and imagery is present in the Chronicles.
I read them lots of times - especially VotDT at #3 - as a youth. Now I find myself having to ignore a lot of the symbolism or they feel really kludgey to me. (I don't know what it says about younger me that I missed a lot/most of it on the early readings even though my mom got them for me at a Catholic book store). Doing that I still had a great time reading all six of them to my spawn several years ago.
 
Last edited:

I have a nice plan for 2026 IF I find the time.
So I never read the classic dnd novels and my plan is to tackle The Dark Elf trilogy, Songs & Swords series and the Last Mythal
If anyone has similar suggestions that they liked, please recommend!
Be aware that the Dark Elf Trilogy of Drizzt's origins in the underdark and coming to the surface were a prequel trilogy written after the Icewind Dale trilogy which were the first novels Salvatore wrote. The characterization for Drizzt in those first ones is a bit different from later characterizations (more of a cold killer in the original surface trilogy whose good is mostly that he fights evil, less of the clearly moral hero he becomes in later characterization in the Dark Elf Trilogy and later written stuff). If you start with the Dark Elf trilogy and follow it up with Icewind it could be a little jarring.

In the Dragonlance line my favorite was Weasel's Luck by Michael Williams, a fairly standalone novel set before the main Dragonlance trilogy. I also really enjoyed the Hickman and Weiss short story anthologies in Dragonlance Tales. The Medusa's Eye series I remember being decent as well.

In Greyhawk I read the original (1e era) Wolf Barbarian stuff by Rose Estes, I liked the author's Endless Quest books much more. I heard good things about Paul Kidd's WotC era Greyhawk novels but have not read any. Gygax's official Greyhawk ones which lead into the not TSR Gord the Rogue series are OK, it has parts I really enjoy but I really dislike some elements and the series anitclimax ending.

I read most all of the original Ravenloft series of novels, the first one Vampire of the Mists by Christie Golden was my favorite. Some rave about Knight of the Black Rose, but I preferred his characterization in the original Dragonlance series by different authors more, so for me it was overall good but not my top.
 

Some rave about Knight of the Black Rose, but I preferred his characterization in the original Dragonlance series by different authors more, so for me it was overall good but not my top.
I'll politely disagree, there. I found that Lord Soth's characterization in Knight of the Black Rose expanded on his character without changing the basic nature of it, which was refreshing; all too often, taking a supporting villain and making them the protagonist of their own story takes a redemptive turn. This one didn't, and I appreciated it for that, as it instead leaned in to how Soth's greatest strength was also his worst failing, which is a quality I enjoy.

By that same token, I'd also recommend King of the Dead, also from the Ravenloft line. The story of Azalin is an excellent one, where the main character's hubris is entirely justified, but which is still no excuse for his moral failings. Leaving aside the minor issue of when he got his curse of being unable to learn new spells (i.e. it should be when he becomes lord of Darkon, and not before), it's a story with which I have very few complaints, and which showcases a captivating tale of how inner strength can (like anything else) become a bad thing.
 

Enchanted Trinkets Complete

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top