Vixo hatched in a Kobold community under the hills the island where Mykonos Sanctuary is located. He enjoyed a privelidged upbringing among the brood of the primary matriarch of a prominent claw (tribe). Well fed and with plenty of free time, he developed into a strong, healthy adult who took advantage of those around him. His coming of age ceremony saw him named Vixonostrak Guenwing and he was proud, for one day he would join a strike team and raid the dwarves like so many before him. Before that would ever happen, his world would come crashing down.
The community warren was suddenly under attack from all around! Their dwarven enemy had come to wipe them out, with a fighting force like never seen before by these kobolds. The Matriarch desperately tried to escape while the third wave of metal-clad dwarves crashed through the cavern wall. Vixo fought carefully, moving from area to area, trying to fight where the kobolds had the advantage of numbers. Eventually he could no longer find such a fight, and was cornered. He offered his surrender to the invaders, and to his surprise, it was accepted. He learned later that his captor was a very practical dwarf by the name of Halrum Ironflow, who would keep Kobold prisoners as slaves.
Life as a servant in the Ironflow clan of dwarves was hard, and he did his best to keep out of sight when possible. Still, he was treated well enough and was able to scrounge leftovers from their meals, which he cleaned up after. He only learned a couple words of the dwarven tongue in his time with them. For yet again, trouble was imminent.
Now, the Dwarves were under attack!
I do not want to play the good Drow though, or Shadar-Kai for that matter. So I am thinking of creating a Princeling from a diposed ruling family, evil to the core, but resourceless amongst his own people. Which raises another issue.
Evil PCs are advised against in the PHB, are we allowing them? I assume we are since we already have at least one - who is approved.
Consider me a very strong advocator for allowing evil PCs that are handled maturely. Now that effects which determine alignment are purged from 4E I think it’s perfectly viable, and I certainly think there’s room in the game for playing Evil alignment and provide an enjoyable play experience without being a psychotic loony.I remember looking at that evil PC's background/personality and thinking "this could be unaligned", but the PHB is kind of wishy-washy in its description of evil, as usual.
It all comes down to what "evil" means. If it means actively devoted to the cause of an evil deity, or evil for its own sake (e.g. torturing psychopath, politician, etc.), then I'd suggest we disallow evil characters. If it just means that you're out for number one and willing to do just about anything to get ahead... I see no reason not to allow that. We could save "evil" for the former and call the latter "unaligned", but there's so little in the RAW now that affects evil vs. unaligned characters differently that I'm not greatly inclined to care.
Brain,
The wiki in this area is... terrible. (It's my fault so I can say that...).
As written Mykonos' Sanctuary was a very peaceful mining community located near Daunton and protected by a powerful monastery.
Then the Cult infiltrated the Monastery leading to the Days of Darkness;
This would launch a series of attacks, most of which weren't identified as being coordinated attacks at the time (example:the headquarters of the Brotherhood of the Spun Staff would be destroyed (becoming the Shattered Spire))
the Five (link is just background, nothing about the brotherhood) ultimately perished stopping the eldrich thing that they unleashed.
During the time that this was going on the dwarves had a very difficult time (touched on briefly here).
The "story" as written about Mykonos' Sanctuary is about corruption in a peaceful community; having them be (another) area that was actually under attack from humanoids raises some issues.
1. Why weren't the kobolds dislodged by the powerful monks (or the five); the five made it a policy to keep the proximate isles reasonably clean; (the repeatedly cleaned up Bacarte for instance)
2. Why weren't they corrupted or dealt with by the brotherhood? (who are presented as being a potent enough force that a concerted attack by non-five Daunton adventurers couldn't dislodge them)
3. Mykonos' Sanctuary obviously isn't a peaceful community if it's under attack by kobolds. How does it change?
4. Broader effect on monstrous races. Daunton and the proximate isles accepts "monstrous" races partially because there is not a recent history of violence. The Rain of Steel was over a hundred years ago, and most threats come from cults, etc.
If we're going to have a vicious group of murderous humanoids that were so tough they couldn't be disloged by the five, or by the monks then that would probably adjust the attitudes of locals (they view Mykonos' Sanctuary very well, the dwarves were good neighbors for centuries and the metals and minerals they supplied are/were an essential part of the economy) to make them more hostile against kobolds.
Since that would adversely effect all kobold PCs I'm somewhat leary.
However if you just want to have kobe a kobold from Mykonos' Sanctuary that's another story.
It's possible that there was a tribe of kobolds who dwelled beneath the isle and were violent at one point, but were pacified (to a degree at least). They may have initially escaped notice of the brotherhood and then helped some dwarves.
Sorry this is so long. Just thinking out loud.