TheEvil
Explorer
It seems pretty evident from reading the boards that there is a wide variety of opinions on what sources are considered official enough to be beyond question. The cynic in me thinks that people consider any source that agrees with what they think is cannon, but any source that disagrees with them is obviously written by someone who is a total idiot with no business being in the game industry.
Obviously, the afformentioned idiots don't help there case by making some pretty blatent errors that then have to be corrected later. The case where what the text said and what the example said directly contradicted each other comes to mind. That said, I am curious what sources people consider to be authoritative enough to generally incorporate into their game as official rulings. What text will you let stand, even if you don't agree with it?
Rules of the Game.
Offical Rule FAQ/Sage Advice .
Errata.
Any WOTC books other the the PHB & DMG.
Hypersmurf - 'nuff said.
Obviously, the afformentioned idiots don't help there case by making some pretty blatent errors that then have to be corrected later. The case where what the text said and what the example said directly contradicted each other comes to mind. That said, I am curious what sources people consider to be authoritative enough to generally incorporate into their game as official rulings. What text will you let stand, even if you don't agree with it?
Rules of the Game.
Offical Rule FAQ/Sage Advice .
Errata.
Any WOTC books other the the PHB & DMG.
Hypersmurf - 'nuff said.