Elder-Basilisk
First Post
So you're saying that the people of the various historical empires would not have worshiped their imperial cults or state religions if they didn't have other religious options available? That seems a bit far-fetched to me. The line between religion and magic is blurry enough that I expect that magicians and witch doctors could handily take care of the parts of what you are referring to as common man religion that the OP's main two gods couldn't.
What matter if you call it worshipping the rain goddess or appeasing the air spirits (who are not gods) when you cut the chicken's head off and spray its blood across the first furrow? Does it matter whether you call the man who leads the ritual a magician or a priest? If you want a more traditional fertility ritual, does it matter whether you lay with the temple prostitute or scatter your seed with the witch? Cosmologically, of course it matters. A rain goddess is a very different matter than the spirits of the air and sacrificing your seed to the goddess of fertility is a different matter than offering it as the material component in a spell. But, it seems to me that you're fulfilling the common man's perceived need for folk religion either way. (To the extent that the common man strictly needs folk religion--history certainly demonstrates that such practices vary in commonality and importance from time to time and from place to place).
What matter if you call it worshipping the rain goddess or appeasing the air spirits (who are not gods) when you cut the chicken's head off and spray its blood across the first furrow? Does it matter whether you call the man who leads the ritual a magician or a priest? If you want a more traditional fertility ritual, does it matter whether you lay with the temple prostitute or scatter your seed with the witch? Cosmologically, of course it matters. A rain goddess is a very different matter than the spirits of the air and sacrificing your seed to the goddess of fertility is a different matter than offering it as the material component in a spell. But, it seems to me that you're fulfilling the common man's perceived need for folk religion either way. (To the extent that the common man strictly needs folk religion--history certainly demonstrates that such practices vary in commonality and importance from time to time and from place to place).
Whizbang Dustyboots said:Because none of those choices were the only available religious options available, which is not the case in the OP's campaign model. In all of those cultures, there was also an object of worship that appealed to the common man, a system of belief that promised them a future reward for their present suffering, or both.
I'm approaching worship from the standpoint of someone who's lived in a non-Christian portion of the third world, where religion and spirituality are massively important parts of daily life. No "essentially Christian perspective" at all.