noretoc said:
The threads that have come up latley make me wonder if the biggest difference between 4ed people and non 4ed is thier definition of fun. I think for people who are really into 4ed thier idea of fun is kicking but and killing bad guys.
Much as I dislike 4e, I'm going to have to disagree.
People either like the 4e mechanics (and, to some extent at this stage, 'fluff') or they don't. Those who do, well, they can do whatever they like with it.
The ways I've bent 3e out of shape to suit the things I've preferred DMing in certain instances, you might not expect such games to happen, if you simply looked at the core rules (or even most of the 3e splats too) and the implied or actual setting(s).
So yeah, I think you'll find people of many different persuasions playing and DMing 4e. Even if it seems to suggest one thing, there's no reason it couldn't be modified or reinterpreted in a multitude of ways.
Personally, I won't bother - partly because a while back I already found systems I love to use, and have incrementally modded and tweaked, just so - but never mind that.
As to what I find fun. . . pretty much all of the classic roleplaying elements: getting together with some great people in a relaxed environment, adventure, exploration, discovery, immersion, excitement, conflict, story, kicking ass. . .
All that stuff, and probably more.
