• NOW LIVE! -- One-Page Adventures for D&D 5th Edition on Kickstarter! A booklet of colourful one-page adventures for D&D 5th Edition ranging from levels 1-9 and designed for a single session of play.
log in or register to remove this ad

 

What is the model scale for 25mm/28mm?

thedungeondelver

First Post

Hey all...

I've got a real conundrum here.

I'm trying to get some models together for an upcoming TWILIGHT:2000 game - specifically some inexpensive military models of tanks and APCs and the like. All of the minis I can find for characters and NPCs are in the 25mm-28mm range. Most wargamers like their stuff a lot more exact than the typical fantasy gaming crowd. That is, for example, Reaper minis are classified as "heroic 28mm" which means that they're anywhere from 25mm-35mm, so essentially stuff from Black Scorpion, The Assault Group and Empress are all going to be really correct.

I have what is supposedly a 1/72 scale papercraft LAV-25 (which if you're curious is an eight-wheeled amphibious armored personnel carrier [Light Armored Vehicle] that mounts a 25mm autocannon), but the 28mm minis I have are gargantuan next to it! To wit: I have one that stands straight up, flatfooted, so if I consider that with helmet in boots he's 6'6" three of him are equal to the length of the LAV cutout...when it should be closer to four (as the LAV is 21 feet long).

I've heard that 1/72 is 20mm, but others say that 1/72 is 25mm, then another friend who IS a wargamer says that 1/48 is closer to 25mm/28mm!

Which is it? Or what is it?

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Jeff Wilder

First Post
28mm represents approximately 1.8 meters (height of a tall man, about 6'3"). 1800mm / 28mm equals about 1/64th scale.

What it is exactly, in modelers' terms, I don't know, sorry. In practice, as long as you're somewhere close to 1/64th scale, your model will work fine.
 

El Mahdi

Muad'Dib of the Anauroch
1/72 scale equates to 1" for 6'. 25mm equals .984" (closer to 1" than 26mm. 1" = 25.4mm). So 25mm figures are 1/72 scale.


26mm = 1.023", 28mm = 1.102", 30mm = 1.18"


1/48 equates to 1.5" for 6', or about 38mm


B-)
 


David Howery

Adventurer
here's a chart I found in a modeling magazine umpteen years ago...
 

Attachments

  • scales.jpg
    scales.jpg
    229.7 KB · Views: 5,247



adwyn

Community Supporter
Scale creep and creative differences between manufacturers make nailing down an exact scale difficult, but 1/64 works for older 25mm models while more modern 28mm lines are often called 1/56 now days.

Because of availability of models many gamers use 1/50 and 1/48th models and for the same reason zombie games often feature rather large 1/43 scale cars. To complicate things many die cast models are made to fit in the box and thus do not match the nominal scale.

Also, if you are using a paper model try resizing it before printing it out .
 

Gilladian

Adventurer
Wayyyyyy back when (mid 70'sish), I understood 25mm scale to represent 6', or the height of a tall human.

I would say that now the 28 mm figures are using that measure as closer to 5' than 6'. They're all terribly oversized, and I just CAN'T bring myself to mix modern minis with my old ones. When the "dwarf" and "halfling" minis are the same height as the previous humans, there's just something wrong!
 



CharlesRyan

Adventurer
I've run a lot of post-apocalyptic games, and have a large collection of vehicles and whatnot.

In my experience, while 1/72 is technically accurate for 25mm, it doesn't look or work right on the gaming table. 25mm-28mm minis take up a lot more space than they technically should, especially when you take the base into consideration (the base is usually about 5 ft across at scale, and adds a foot to the minis' height).

I find that 1/48 tends to work a lot better. You can also find loads of cheap die-cast toy cars commonly at 1/43, and they work great as well.

The larger the vehicle, the closer you want it to "actual" size. A small car at 1/72 would look ridiculously small next to 25mm/28mm minis, but it's less pronounced for a semi or a helicopter.

Mongoose made a prepainted modern warfare minis game a few years ago that included a lot of vehicles; maybe you can find some on eBay or whatever. They're nice, but they're a good example of what I'm talking about--they look stupidly small on the gaming table, even though they're exactly to scale.
 

NewJeffCT

First Post
Wayyyyyy back when (mid 70'sish), I understood 25mm scale to represent 6', or the height of a tall human.

I would say that now the 28 mm figures are using that measure as closer to 5' than 6'. They're all terribly oversized, and I just CAN'T bring myself to mix modern minis with my old ones. When the "dwarf" and "halfling" minis are the same height as the previous humans, there's just something wrong!

True - my old Ral Partha miniatures look puny next to modern Reaper and Warhammer stuff. Heck, my old Warhammer stuff looks smaller than my new Warhammer stuff (I have the infamous old WH goblin giving the middle finger, and it is decidedly smaller than my newer goblins from the folks at Warhammer)

However, scale is not just old vs new. The Gravetouched Ghoul D&D miniature looks gigantic next to the Ghast D&D miniature, even though the ghast is supposed to be more powerful/elite than a mere ghoul. The ghast looks like a preteen boy before becoming undead, while the ghoul looks like an NBA power forward by comparison.
 

Jeff Wilder

First Post
However, scale is not just old vs new. The Gravetouched Ghoul D&D miniature looks gigantic next to the Ghast D&D miniature, even though the ghast is supposed to be more powerful/elite than a mere ghoul.
Size creep in DDM was a source of great frustration to many of us who collected from the beginning. It was partially a function of design, partially a function of the larger degree of unpredictability in mold contraction and expansion, partially a function of sculptor preferences, partially a function of method (e.g., the later CAD minis tended to be significantly larger in all dimensions), and (IMO) partially a matter of carelessness.
 

thedungeondelver

First Post

I decided to go with 1:72 since this is TWILIGHT:2000 and not sweat it that much. 1:48 models are way, way expensive for what I want to do and there won't be that much vehicle combat anyway.

I may pick up a couple of ITALIARI Soviet kits since there's damn few papercraft 1:72 kits for stuff like BTR-80s, MT-LBs and BDRMs (or T-series tanks for that matter).

Ultimately I think it will be fine.
 


Kadmon

Villager
For Twilight:2000 I'd also recommend 1:72 miniatures, especially as there are plenty of new insurgent and terrorist sets that can be used for ragtag militias, and both the figures and the vehicles are cheaper than others. It's also easy to find scenery for that scale.
1:16 is also useful if you already own the action figures, or if you can be satisfied with cheap Chinese ones. Those minis are easier to customise, and you can put any kind of weapons in their hands. With 1:16 my problem was with creating bases for the miniatues that will hold them, and also, I used old casette cases, books and such for scenery, but there were some players who felt the non-realistic terrain causes problems for their immersion, but and storing scale model terrain is problematic for me.
 

An Advertisement

Advertisement4

Top