What is the most detailed setting available?

[Dioltach]

There's the Wheel of Time RPG. The game books were fairly light on detail, but the novels...!

 

[Jd Smith1]

Thay invades Rashemon, inflicts some damage, and is repulsed by the berserkers and witches. Thay has some plans to do so again in the future.

The Zhentarim has some nefarious political scheme.

That covers a lot of it.

Yea, but that's just a couple incidents for an entire continent. Definition of borders, laws, succession, military forces...all are glossed over or absent in FR. It is gear towards the adventuring party travelling from crawl to crawl. It lacks any sense of regional and international politics that other settings have. But it is a contender.

 

[GreyLord]

I would find it hard to believe that the Forgotten Realms does not have the most written about it. It does not have every noble bloodline, but the volume of setting material would be hard to match.

I agree.

I don't think any setting has had as many books written on the Forgotten Realms.

From over 100 novels (actually, isn't it like 300 novels or more), to dozens of sourcebooks (3e/3.5 alone had a HUGE number of source books, some of them VERY specific to certain areas of the Forgotten Realms), to individual adventures and modules (many which detail down to the peasant in a field as well as everyone else in the local area) I think the amount of detail within it and the breadth it covers is FAR more than any other system.

The only one that I think may come close or surpass it at this point would be Paizo's Golarian.

 

[GreyLord]

Yea, but that's just a couple incidents for an entire continent. Definition of borders, laws, succession, military forces...all are glossed over or absent in FR. It is gear towards the adventuring party travelling from crawl to crawl. It lacks any sense of regional and international politics that other settings have. But it is a contender.

Do you guys actually read the Forgotten Realms materials?

There are definite borders (and over time, border changes), different sourcebooks list laws of different areas, succession is definitely addressed in some sourcebooks as well as in far more detail (political maneuvering, manipulations, etc) in novels, and military forces are also addressed for many areas as in standing military force and armies, etc.

Forgotten Realms is one setting where you can go as deep and far as you want...or just stick with the surface.

 

[Jd Smith1]

Do you guys actually read the Forgotten Realms materials?

There are definite borders (and over time, border changes), different sourcebooks list laws of different areas, succession is definitely addressed in some sourcebooks as well as in far more detail (political maneuvering, manipulations, etc) in novels, and military forces are also addressed for many areas as in standing military force and armies, etc.

Forgotten Realms is one setting where you can go as deep and far as you want...or just stick with the surface.

The maps I've seen don't display political boundaries. Could you direct me to a map that does show political boundaries?

 

[jdrakeh]

For RPGs, I think Harn and Glorantha probably have the most meaningful detail. They both dig deeply into aspects of culture, geography, and slice of life details that most other RPGs gloss over entirely. Tekumel is also a contender here, though the amount of material published for the setting is less voluminous than that published for Harn and Glorantha.

 

[Tonguez]

Mythic Britain - theres a reason why Fantasy Common defaults to English and why 90% of every fantasy fiction story since Mort d'Arthur could be easily plonked down on pseudo-England+Doggerland and look familiar

 

[GreyLord]

The maps I've seen don't display political boundaries. Could you direct me to a map that does show political boundaries?

You should read the basic Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide than.

It has political boundaries, though being a 3e book perhaps that's not the type of book you want to read. It gathers information found in books and modules up to that also included local political boundaries. That said, it is correct and incorrect at the same time.

It is correct for the time it was written, but not absolutely correct for the Forgotten Realms.

The Reason is probably better shown by example than just stating.

The Forgotten Realms has different sovereignties, such as independent city states, Nation States, and Regional areas (such as the Dale lands).

Could you tell me the exact boundaries of Athens, Sparta and Corinth? Anything that tries to define them absolutely normally is wrong because the areas of control varied at different points in their existence as city states. They DID have boundaries normally as cities, at least defined at various points of time, though the actual area they controlled went further.

For these types of boundaries you can see them very easily in the first box set of the Forgotten Realms released with what many call the Gray Box.

I expect that you are not looking at it from a City-State perspective though (which is what the early Forgotten realms were really written in regards to, more of a City-State political control aspect, though there were nations as well, there were a LOT [and still are} of independent cities.

There were Kingdoms set up though, such as the Moonshaes. These are also a region. The Islands were normally shown with pretty distinct borders (as they were Islands).

Now, if you were wanting area of control, that is VASTLY DIFFERENT than political borders. For example, what were the borders of the United States in 1780? It is actually rather nebulous, especially when you consider the areas the French claimed, the Spanish Claimed, the British Claimed, and the Colonies claimed.

Even in the 1820's-1850's the borders of the United States were more nebulous with areas claimed by both the United States and Mexico. This is one reason the Mexican-American War was fought between the United States and Mexico.

This is also the time periods (U.S. Westward expansion, City State period, etc) which most resemble the Realms.

This makes for a rather rich political climate if you want to run one like that because War and Politics go hand in hand with border contentions like that.

You may want something more like the more recent 80 years (because before the 1940s, borders were still highly contested in some areas, even in Europe itself, for example the highly contested region along the border between Franch and Germany which is seen by some as one of the sparks for WWI and WWII) where political boundaries are finally more or less seen as rather stable.

That still doesn't address the idea of control. While one may have regions, what are the actual areas of control?

The United States claims at least areas up to 20 miles from it's borders (normally more easily enforceable on the water than land though, and to avoid contentions, this is where it normally takes place, with some overlap in waters between the US and Mexico and Canada).

China claims control over areas up to 200 miles from it's borders.

So, in that light, if you want a 21st century take on political borders being defined rather than the more traditional take from the past several thousand years, that's rather easy. Just utilize the Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting Guide which was written for 3e. That gathers all the various information from past books and modules into a comprehensive map with what you can call your political boundaries.

If you want more of a take from what it was like previously with defined walls for city states, and descriptions of where the Kingdoms and lands extend to and from (as found in the Grey box) you can use the Campaign Box from 1e.

Both have political boundaries defined, but in different ways depending on whether you want the Frontier is always expanding but undefined, go find and adventure in the wild (1e) to the more modern tastes of everything is more or less civilized, go adventure in the known world (3e).

 

[Jd Smith1]

You should read the basic Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide than.
snip

So no borders on maps? That is a serious drawback as compared to the better-detailed settings already mentioned.

Faerun certainly has a mass of setting information, but its data presentation is inferior to the other contenders.

 

[Aldarc]

I am submitting Harn. It's maps are utterly amazing, nearly every major city is mapped, the royal bloodlines of every Human & Demi-Human realm are detailed, and scores of manors are detailed down to the peasants in the fields.

Top that.


(Note: setting, not system).

Does Hârn have a conlang? Tékumel does. Nor is it the only one.