ShinHakkaider
Adventurer
I think that I have the first 2 or three adventures of the WOTBS AP (3.5). I remember them being interesting but not really my cup of tea.
Then 4E came and it seemed that EN Publishing hitched their wagon to WOTC and 4E. My dollars went to Paizo because they were supporting the game that I wanted to play and and ENWorld wasn't.
That's pretty much where I am now.
Not really interested in (Santiago) Pathfinder Future, if I wanted to play a game set in the future I'd use a different system altogether (Hero or M&M probably). An after the fact conversion of WOTBS seemed like a late attempt to hitch onto the Paizo wagon after the fact and I have no interest in SteamPunk so there's that.
I do have a few of the older ENworld produced PDF's for 3.5 and they are pretty darn good stuff. But like I said my money goes to Paizo pretty much. The only way that this changes is that if ENWorld Pubs puts out something that I'm actually interested in that can compete with what Paizo puts out in terms of support, consistency and quality (both material and physical).
Then 4E came and it seemed that EN Publishing hitched their wagon to WOTC and 4E. My dollars went to Paizo because they were supporting the game that I wanted to play and and ENWorld wasn't.
That's pretty much where I am now.
Not really interested in (Santiago) Pathfinder Future, if I wanted to play a game set in the future I'd use a different system altogether (Hero or M&M probably). An after the fact conversion of WOTBS seemed like a late attempt to hitch onto the Paizo wagon after the fact and I have no interest in SteamPunk so there's that.
I do have a few of the older ENworld produced PDF's for 3.5 and they are pretty darn good stuff. But like I said my money goes to Paizo pretty much. The only way that this changes is that if ENWorld Pubs puts out something that I'm actually interested in that can compete with what Paizo puts out in terms of support, consistency and quality (both material and physical).