Wombat
First Post
The world is not about WINNING and LOSING.
So why should there be that single line in sports?
I give you two grand examples that many people will remember -- Eddy the Eagle & the Jamaican Bobsled Team.
Were they great? No, not even close. But they brought a grand human element to the game, along with huge amounts of clumsiness. More than this, however, they showed determination, gumption, and the pure, plain joy of competition.
The Olympics are set up to recognize three tiers of winners -- Gold, Silver, Bronze. The same is true in many other sports (say, for example, Win, Place, and Show...). Not only do I see nothing wrong with this, but I think it is a matter that actually improves such competitions. Being the second or third best in these competitions is truly praiseworthy, showing how much time and dedication has been put into individual and team efforts, facing off with dozens, nay, hundreds of opponents to get to this place.
Is there any problem is recognizing worth in this manner? I see none.
So why should there be that single line in sports?
I give you two grand examples that many people will remember -- Eddy the Eagle & the Jamaican Bobsled Team.
Were they great? No, not even close. But they brought a grand human element to the game, along with huge amounts of clumsiness. More than this, however, they showed determination, gumption, and the pure, plain joy of competition.
The Olympics are set up to recognize three tiers of winners -- Gold, Silver, Bronze. The same is true in many other sports (say, for example, Win, Place, and Show...). Not only do I see nothing wrong with this, but I think it is a matter that actually improves such competitions. Being the second or third best in these competitions is truly praiseworthy, showing how much time and dedication has been put into individual and team efforts, facing off with dozens, nay, hundreds of opponents to get to this place.
Is there any problem is recognizing worth in this manner? I see none.
